Skip to main content

The Courts - particularly the family courts

One area I have campaigned on in the past and would intend to campaign on after the election (whether I win or not) relates to the judicial system.

There are particular problems within the Family Courts.

As it currently stands the courts rely for public family law proceedings on expert opinion.  That expert opinion is provided mainly by employees of the local authority.  Additionally from time to time other experts are appointed who are theoretically independent, but in practice can be on real or effective retainers from the local authority.

Inevitably the recommendations to the court are driven by the management priorities of the local authority.  Those management priorities are driven by Ofsted who are required by central government to get more children adopted.  Hence we have a system where a key priority is to remove children from one family (for whatever reasons) and place them with another.

It may not seem rational, but that is the case.

Parents should have the right to have truly independent experts.

There are many other issues with the Family Courts.  One of the problems is that there is often very little actual law in the family courts.  The judges have a very wide discretion which leads to different judges making very different decisions on the same facts.  That causes a wider problem.

The secrecy, of course, adds to the difficulties.   One of my more successful campaigns was to get a reduction in secret imprisonment.   Injustices, however, are still hidden away by the threat of locking people up for talking about them.  I know of a number of cases where people have been imprisoned by the Court of Protection on wrongful expert opinion.  However, it is a criminal offence for them to be allowed to speak out.  These are cases where the court decides that someone does not have the capacity to decide where they live - see for example the imprisonment of Kathy Danby.

Hence greater transparency is needed so we know what is being done even if parties remain anonymous.  In theory the courts are doing this, but in fact they mainly don't.
Cases
These sorts of cases worry me: this case is where a father's views on abortion and homosexuality - not ones I agree with, were considered relevant.
This case is another one where I disagree with the mother, but don't think the possibility of expressing racist terms is sufficient or relevant to care proceedings.
In a wider sense there is too much toleration of false allegations throughout the judicial system.  I managed to get three successful criminal appeals allowed whilst I was a Member of Parliament.  This included seeing how the system is resistant to considering that allegations are false.  This is a particular problem also in public law proceedings where social workers who mislead the court have actually been promoted. It has to be recognised that from time to time false allegations are made by all sorts of things for malicious reasons and at times these allegations are also made to the police. The idea that it shows prejudice against victims to recognise this truth is absurd.


I accept that I am not popular with some in the legal profession for being critical of how the system operates.  However, the law should serve everyone and not just the legal profession.   You will identify a number of ranting lawyers from time to time who make vague and unevidenced assertions against me.  However, they will not shout me down and I will continue to campaign against injustice.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re False Allegations Campaign

Many people will know that my family and I have been subject to a campaign of false allegations by Esther Baker for the past 4 1/2 years. Yesterday there was a court judgment Baker v Hemming [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB) which formally confirmed that the allegations were false. Esther Baker, who had brought a libel claim against me, dropped her defence of Truth to my counter-claim and was taken by the judge as no longer trying to prove her allegations. Due to Baker's various breaches of court rules and orders, she has been barred from further repeating her allegations even in the court proceedings. Further claim of mine in libel against Baker are ongoing. There is a good summary in the Daily Mail here.

This demonstrates the challenge in fighting false allegations in today's Britain. A substantial campaign was built up to promote allegations which had no substance to them. Various Labour MPs and in pa…

Service launched to reduce the pain of calling a call centre.

Click here to try the beta test call entre phoning service"John Hemming, who has created an internet Startup called Cirrostratus since he ceased being an MP, is launching a free online service to make life easier for people phoning call centres.   The service is provided by Cirrostratus, but the SIP backbone is provided by the multi-award winning business VoIP solution, Soho66." John said, "Many people find phoning call centres a real pain.  Our service is aiming to make things a lot easier.   One click on alink or the bookmarks list and our server will phone up the call centre and get through all the menus.  This is a lot faster than when people have to phone up and is less irritating." "Additionally the system uses WebRtc and the internet to make the call. This means that people don't find their normal phone system being blocked whilst they hang on the line waiting to speak to a human being." Marketing Manager from Soho66, David McManus, said: &q…

A grassroots uprising against terrorism

Original Date 26th May 2017

One thing I used to do when I was the Member of Parliament for Yardley was to call together meetings of all of the religious organisations in Yardley as a Yardley multi-faith group.  In many ways it is the creation of informal links between people that makes communication easier even if there is no formal decision making power.

Obviously this is something I would intend to do again if the people of Yardley ask me to take on the responsibility of representing them in parliament.

It highlights the sort of thing that politicians can do which arises from a leadership role within communities rather than any constitutional position.

I have already written in an earlier blog post about the principles of resolving conflict.  It can be summarised as "murdering innocents is wrong".

A number of local mosques have issued statements following the atrocity in Manchester and I think it is worth quoting from parts of them.

One said that the mosque "Unequivoc…