Skip to main content

Resolving Asymmetric Conflicts

In a world which is getting more dangerous it is important to look at how conflicts can actually be resolved.

England has managed to avoid either a civil war or a revolution since 1688.  That is because people have accepted the constitutional settlement and that was a popular settlement.

From time to time there have been pressures for change.  Those have normally been resolved through essentially peaceful means including a referendum in Scotland and Wales.   The Northern Irish Peace process was much harder to resolve because of the violent incidents that occurred.

The reason violent incidents make conflicts harder to resolve is that they change the balance of a dispute from one which is to some extent rational to one which is driven by emotions and particularly the emotion of revenge.

Violent incidents that result in the deaths of innocent people always create more anger than incidents involving combatants.   This often creates a desire for revenge amongst the side of the dispute that has suffered from the deaths of their innocents as part of some atrocity.

In the Middle East, for example, the dispute has created a situation in which there are people on both sides of the conflict that desire revenge more than peace.  They may not wish to publicly state that, but politicians and anyone else who wishes to see peace need to recognise this.

Hence if we wish to resolve such conflicts which normally will require some compromise the top priority is to stop people killing each other and particularly prevent the deaths and maiming of non-combatants.  It may sound counter intuitive, but force may be required to achieve that.  The innocent, however, must be protected.  Unjust acts such as terrorism must be confronted.

In many ways International Humanitarian Law (the Geneva Conventions) has developed because of the recognition that this a route toward peace.

Similar issues arise in the conflict in Kashmir.  Top priority is to stop human rights abuses.  Without that happening any further resolution is very difficult.

This is why the suggestion by the Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell that "bombs"  ... "brought Britain to the negotiating table" are so dangerous.  It is important that groups such as Daesh recognise that atrocities will get them no-where.

It was a major error of judgment by Jeremy Corbyn to appoint him to one of the most senior posts in the Shadow cabinet.   It leads to a valid conclusion that the approach of Jeremy Corbyn as Prime Minister would be to create a situation in which terrorism is appeased rather than confronted.  That will lead to more terrorism.







Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NHS reorganisation No 3,493,233

Followers of my blog will have seen the NHS question about how many reorganisations have we had. We've yet another. The number of PCTs (Primary Care Trusts) nationally is to halve. This means merging East and North. (and then probably HoB and south). It would be nice if people would stick with one structure. There is a quotation ( Which sadly does not appear to be a true quotation ) We trained hard . . . but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization. But has to have been originated by someone. The web link shown goes through the derivation which appears to be more linked to an anonymous British Soldier WW2 than any Roman or Greek General called by a name perming 2 out of (Gaius, Galus, Petronius and Arbiter). From the...