Skip to main content

Music Copyright and Performers

I have linked to Dominic McGonigal's web log about copyright terms.

When it comes, for example, to a video with music there are normally three copyrights.

There is an original copyright in the music (the dots) which exists whoever plays the music.

Then there is a copyright in the musical recording which exists for the performers.

Then there is a visual copyright in the video itself.

These different copyrights have different terms. That in music lasts beyond the death of the writer of the music. The performance one, however, only lasts for 50 years after the performance.

Dominic works for the Performers Protection organisation (PPL) who handle the music performance copyright and video performance copyright in the UK. They and people such as Cliff Richard are campaigning for a copyright extension.


Glyn Wintle said…
Have you seen the Open Rights Groups video explaining why doubling the term of copyright is a bad idea?

Plus have you seen the long list of organisations condemning copyright term extension in Europe?

Popular posts from this blog

Standards Board and Ken Livingstone

The link is to the case where Ken Livingstone appealed the decision of the Adjudication Panel for England. The Standards Board and associated Adjudication Panel have done a lot of damage to democracy in the UK. The courts are, however, bringing them into more sanity. The point about Ken Livingstone's case is that it was high profile and he also could afford to appeal. The Standard Board has a problem in that those subject to its enquiries face substantial costs that they cannot claim back. This is an issue that needs further work. In essence the Judge found that what he said brought him into disrepute, but not the office of Mayor. We do need the machinery of the SBE and APE to concentrate on things that matter rather than people being rude to each other.