Skip to main content

The Hacked Off Campaign don't answer questions

Every so often I get a lobbying email from the Hacked Off campaign. At the end of those emails they offer to respond to questions. I have on a number of occasions. sent them questions or comments in response, but they don't respond - even though they claim that they will.

I have also spoken to Evan Harris who has said they will respond, but nothing ever happens.

This particular campaign are using a valid grievance (the hacking of phones) as a mechanism to bring in a substantial restraint on the investigation and reporting of issues involving powerful people and the establishment. The least they could do is to answer questions.

Notes: Letter to Chris Jeffries 3rd December 2012 - no response, Email to John Dickinson-Lilley 18th January 2013 - no response, Email to John Dickinson-Lilley 17th March 2013 (no response, but to be fair this is only today). Also an email to the Media Standards Trust Gordon Ramsay 11th February 2013 - no response. (The Media Standards Trust used to be the same as Hacked Off, but now they have been separated).

Comments

Jake Maverick said…
well, neither do pigyobs/ suspected g-men, 'cept with more violence...
such as 'who are you'....

so what's your point?

you can't even 'serve' one without their name and the only way to get that is to kill one, and i dnt think you can sure/ privately prosecute a corpse...

another elderly TI currently on the run, lil chance she'll be able to make it out of country even though a place has been found for her...her only realitic choice is suicide now as is mine, but that's rumoured to be illegal as well...as is co-=operating with the psycho that are after her...
10:20 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Six months for recording a court hearing - Norman Scarth

The link is in Russian about the imprisonment of Norman Scarth who is actually 85. He has a complex history including a court hearing which found that he used a chainsaw to fight off bailiffs when he was 75. [a court judgment which is disputed see comments] However, that does not justify imprisoning him for 6 months for recording a court hearing (see the link and ask google to translate it if your Russian is not up to it). It has got into the Argyll News Because he has been held such that people cannot get to him to sign paperwork an application for a writ of Habeas Corpus was made today. This has been adjourned until next week. The English judicial system is really not good at responding to major abuses of human rights by the judicial system.
57 comments
Read more