Skip to main content

FJC debate on multiple removals

This is a link a debate by the family justice council about cases where mothers have 10+ children removed from them in sequence. Often the response to a removal is the bereavement response of getting pregnant which means that the strategy is very damaging.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The cases I am familiar with are pure unadulterated corruption . I believe there are a small number of cases where there are multiple removals but they are in a minority. So is this another example of muddying the waters. I recall the minutes of a particular FJC meeting recorded in the archives. The recorded information obviously related directly to the Justice for Linda Lewis case. tt could have been no other and it is often on the basis of these 'facts' that policy is formed. Needless to say the information was incorrect.

Popular posts from this blog

Why are babies born young?

Why are babies born young? This sounds like an odd question. People would say "of course babies are born young". However, this goes to the core of the question of human (or animal) development. Why is it that as time passes people develop initially through puberty and then for women through menopause and more generally getting diseases such as sarcopenia, osteoporosis, diabetes and cancer, but most of the time babies start showing no signs of this. Lots of research into this has happened over the years and now I think it is clear why this is. It raises some interesting questions. Biological youth is about how well a cell functions. Cells that are old in a biological sense don't work that well. One of the ways in which cells stop working is they fail to produce the full range of proteins. Generally the proteins that are produced from longer genes stop being produced. The reason for this relates to how the Genes work (the Genome). Because the genome is not gettin...