Skip to main content

FJC debate on multiple removals

This is a link a debate by the family justice council about cases where mothers have 10+ children removed from them in sequence. Often the response to a removal is the bereavement response of getting pregnant which means that the strategy is very damaging.

Comments

Anonymous said…
The cases I am familiar with are pure unadulterated corruption . I believe there are a small number of cases where there are multiple removals but they are in a minority. So is this another example of muddying the waters. I recall the minutes of a particular FJC meeting recorded in the archives. The recorded information obviously related directly to the Justice for Linda Lewis case. tt could have been no other and it is often on the basis of these 'facts' that policy is formed. Needless to say the information was incorrect.
11:37 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Six months for recording a court hearing - Norman Scarth

The link is in Russian about the imprisonment of Norman Scarth who is actually 85. He has a complex history including a court hearing which found that he used a chainsaw to fight off bailiffs when he was 75. [a court judgment which is disputed see comments] However, that does not justify imprisoning him for 6 months for recording a court hearing (see the link and ask google to translate it if your Russian is not up to it). It has got into the Argyll News Because he has been held such that people cannot get to him to sign paperwork an application for a writ of Habeas Corpus was made today. This has been adjourned until next week. The English judicial system is really not good at responding to major abuses of human rights by the judicial system.
57 comments
Read more