Skip to main content

Re: B - Why do the English Courts think there is a problem when the Swedish courts do not

This case is an interesting one just reported by the Court of Appeal. The first question that should be asked is why it took the English judicial system over a year to decide it did not have jurisdiction.

The second question is why the English Courts have decided there is an issue when the Swedish Courts have not. They cannot both be right. It is my view that the evidence in the family courts in England is frequently intellectually unreliable and as a consequence the decisions are not well grounded in reality.

This case seems to substantiate my view and give good reasons why the system in England takes the wrong children into care.

Comments

Anonymous said…
A case of angiodema I think Although for some inexplicable reason this important bit of information has been missed out.
4:12 pm
Anonymous said…
For those interested and that should be anybody who may come across a case of angioedema then the following Medscape submission is a must read. Why Medscape? Well because all UK information seems to be far too simplistic and patronising.and Medscape is acknowledged to be one of the best.
http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/135208-treatment
12:14 pm
Anonymous said…
If it is possible may we have an update on this case please.
3:04 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Six months for recording a court hearing - Norman Scarth

The link is in Russian about the imprisonment of Norman Scarth who is actually 85. He has a complex history including a court hearing which found that he used a chainsaw to fight off bailiffs when he was 75. [a court judgment which is disputed see comments] However, that does not justify imprisoning him for 6 months for recording a court hearing (see the link and ask google to translate it if your Russian is not up to it). It has got into the Argyll News Because he has been held such that people cannot get to him to sign paperwork an application for a writ of Habeas Corpus was made today. This has been adjourned until next week. The English judicial system is really not good at responding to major abuses of human rights by the judicial system.
57 comments
Read more