Skip to main content

Camilla Cavendish on published judgments - Martin Narey is wrong (as is often the case)

Camilla Cavendish has written in the Sunday Times about the publishing of the judgments. Her column is behind a paywall, but I have extracted the last paragraph:
You may say that this is none of our business. But the number of blunders that seem to have been made in this case, by a local authority in chaos, suggests it needs to be our business until there is true openness. I hope the good lord justice will finish the job; and that those who so confidently proclaim that there are only a “handful” of miscarriages of justice will realise how tragically wrong they have been.

Comments

Jake Maverick said…
is it really all about the money (i.e. money stolen fromother people/ taxation) or soemthing more sinister at foot?

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2013/07/money-nsa-vote/

Popular posts from this blog

Six months for recording a court hearing - Norman Scarth

The link is in Russian about the imprisonment of Norman Scarth who is actually 85. He has a complex history including a court hearing which found that he used a chainsaw to fight off bailiffs when he was 75. [a court judgment which is disputed see comments] However, that does not justify imprisoning him for 6 months for recording a court hearing (see the link and ask google to translate it if your Russian is not up to it). It has got into the Argyll News Because he has been held such that people cannot get to him to sign paperwork an application for a writ of Habeas Corpus was made today. This has been adjourned until next week. The English judicial system is really not good at responding to major abuses of human rights by the judicial system.