Skip to main content

Another super or hyper injunction.

The Mail on Sunday reported, yesterday, about another secret court proceeding. It is probably not a hyper injunction.

This one is a criminal proceeding.

Let us make reference to ECHR:

In the determination of his civil rights and obligations or of any criminal charge against him, everyone is entitled to a fair and public hearing within a reasonable time by an independent and impartial tribunal established by law. Judgment shall be pronounced publicly but the press and public may be excluded from all or part of the trial in the interest of morals, public order or national security in a democratic society, where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.

In particular we don't know which of the exemptions are being used. A judgment has been given for a secret injunction, but the judgment itself is secret.

  • morals,
  • public order or national security in a democratic society,
  • where the interests of juveniles or the protection of the private life of the parties so require,
  • or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the interests of justice.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Six months for recording a court hearing - Norman Scarth

The link is in Russian about the imprisonment of Norman Scarth who is actually 85. He has a complex history including a court hearing which found that he used a chainsaw to fight off bailiffs when he was 75. [a court judgment which is disputed see comments] However, that does not justify imprisoning him for 6 months for recording a court hearing (see the link and ask google to translate it if your Russian is not up to it). It has got into the Argyll News Because he has been held such that people cannot get to him to sign paperwork an application for a writ of Habeas Corpus was made today. This has been adjourned until next week. The English judicial system is really not good at responding to major abuses of human rights by the judicial system.