Skip to main content

NATO and the Gaza Flotilla

The link is to a post by Craig Murray who used to be the UK Ambassador to Uzbekistan.

He makes the interesting point that Turkish vessels have been attacked by a non-member of NATO and that Nato's prime function is a military alliance established to defend its members against attack.

It raises the question as to what extent NATO is independent of the USA. He also looks at the conflict in Afghanistan from that perspective.

The conflict is in essence a tribally based conflict where the NATO forces are aligned with a number of minority tribes.

This is dressed up as an ideological conflict. That is an error of analysis.


Anonymous said…
John Hemming,
I struggle with one point in the article - the Turkish Flotilla were attacked because they were disobeying the law (breaking the blockade even when they were asked several times to head towards Ashdod. Furthermore Israeli soldiers boarded with no intention of killing and only resorted to attack when they were beaten as they boarded.
Therefore while NATO can attack Israel over it's actions, it was always unlikely to take serious action - it had no right to.

Popular posts from this blog

Standards Board and Ken Livingstone

The link is to the case where Ken Livingstone appealed the decision of the Adjudication Panel for England. The Standards Board and associated Adjudication Panel have done a lot of damage to democracy in the UK. The courts are, however, bringing them into more sanity. The point about Ken Livingstone's case is that it was high profile and he also could afford to appeal. The Standard Board has a problem in that those subject to its enquiries face substantial costs that they cannot claim back. This is an issue that needs further work. In essence the Judge found that what he said brought him into disrepute, but not the office of Mayor. We do need the machinery of the SBE and APE to concentrate on things that matter rather than people being rude to each other.