Skip to main content

Coalition - John Hemming's view

There has been a roller coaster ride since the General Election and there has not yet been a week since the first results were declared.

The Country faces some very serious problems. The facts are clear

1. The Country needs a stable government and it will take the full term of a parliament to sort out the deficit.
2. The Labour Party took their ball and bat away and refused to play.
3. A minority Conservative government would not give sufficient stability.

Those three points mean that the only conclusion in the national interest is for the Lib Dems to enter into coalition with the Conservatives to provide stable government. This requires compromises on both sides and what we will see is likely to be more of a centrist government than a centre left government (which is what a Lib Dem Government would be likely to be).

The fact is, however, that the agreement that I have just published is a major step forwards on a number of issues beyond that of the deficit.

1. Fair taxes. Reduction in the tax burden for people on lower incomes in preference to tax cuts for the rich.

2. Political reform. An elected House of Lords using PR. A referendum on Alternative Vote. The Wright Committee reforms (that Labour Whips blocked at the end of the last parliament).

3. Linking the state pension to earnings.

4. Civil Liberties - movements away from an oppressive state.

Labour were in government for 13 years, but we still don't have an elected house of lords, have gone backwards on civil liberties and have government finances in a real mess.

I think a lot of people will be happy with what the national "Progressive Partnership" intend to do.

Personally I intend to continue looking after my constituency and campaigning to sort out problems with family law, prevent election fraud, cope with the consequences of peak oil and strengthen international law amongst other things.

That will probably mean that I will not be a government minister. I am, however, a politician who wishes to do things rather than be things. If being something prevents me doing something then the doing takes priority over the being.

Comments

Jerry said…
Theres been masses of unsettled comments about the Lib Dems selling out, not listening to the voter, the net is full of it, understanably so, what has not been reported upon is that We are in un-charted waters now with this coalition government, its been some 30 odd years since the last, we live in a completly different country now and as many voters will be saddened by it, most will welcome it, including me.

All we need to make sure now is that nothing causes the collapse of the coalition.

It is plainly obvious that the electorate were not pursuaded to vote for any one party,this forces the coalition government, we need to realise just how bad the situation could have been if no government was formed.

I would like to add also that sadly there's been a few really hard working MP's and national treasures have been scalped by the election, more so some MP's who haven't been scalped when they should, maybe in 5 years time fingers crossed.

John, this government is in a position now for real life changing situations, some will be a bitter pill to swallow,most though will be for the better of the minority of this country,

I for one take my hat off, raise a glass and salute the Lib Dems for showing the country its not all about me,me,me.

Popular posts from this blog

Trudiagnostic change PACE leaderboard algorithm - was in position 40, now position 44 - does it matter?

Trudiagnostic have changed the way they handle the Rejuvenation Olympics Leaderboard algorithm. The result of this initially was that I was globally no 40 and have now dropped to 44. Trudiagnostic are a US company that get samples of blood and they look at the DNA to see which parts of the DNA have methyl groups (CH3) attached to them. These modifications to DNA are called methylation markers. DunedinPACE is an algorithm which uses DNA methylation markers in white blood cells to work out how quickly or slowly someone is aging. I had three results on this. The odd thing about the results was that whilst my epigenetic age calculated from the same methylation markers was going down, the speed at which I was aging was going up. I find this somewhat counterintuitive. It is, however, I think relevant that in a global contest my approach on biochemistry which is quite different to many other people's does seem to keep up with others working in the same area. To that extent it...