Skip to main content

Interesting Health Questions (inc MRSA)

The National Health Service is an important issue for many people. One aspect of that has been the question as to how prevalent MRSA is (the "Super Bug").

The linked report from The Telegraph indicates that it appears on the death certificate of about 1,000 patients a year. The real question, however, is how prevalent it really is.

Doctors from time to time report "old age" as the cause of death. This could include MRSA. Also Pneumonia is reported which also could involve MRSA. The difficulty is that we really need an audit of the records to find out what the true story is. Even in a City Council debate about MRSA there were two examples of people where MRSA was part of the story, but did not appear on the death certificate.

The real problem is that if MRSA appearing on the death certificate causes considerable stress then there will be a tendency for it to be omitted as a cause. This makes it difficult to really know what is going on.

Regardless as to how prevalent it is, however, we really should be able to do a better job of maintaining hygiene in hospitals - which is key in terms of limiting infection. One estimate has been that 40% of inpatients get an infection in hospital. This figure is, however, from about 5 years ago.

Another interesting question is the use of drugs. What proportion of prescribed drugs are of no use (I have heard an allegation of about 15%) and what proportion of patients are being treated primarily as a result of the side effects of prescription (I have heard an allegation of 10%). This is easily equally important as the issue of MRSA and probably more so, but it depends upon the outcomes.

Issues relating to Health are probably one of the group of issues that are worst handled through a simplified televisual debate. For example a side effect of a cough that arises from a drug to deal with high blood pressure is minor in comparison to the possible heart attack or stroke that could be the alternative.

Iatrogenesis is, however, something that should not be ignored. Much can happen as a result of patient demand, such as patients demanding anti-biotics for viral infections. This is, however, a very difficult area to handle as it does not respond well to the shallowness of much of what passes for public debate.

Another debate in the health service that does not normally see the light of day is how many people are being paid the wrong salaries. The salary system is relatively complex and there are widespread allegations of people being overpaid or even paid for a long time when they have left their jobs. These issues relate primarily to the complexity of the system (and the fact that people will generally complain about being underpaid, but not complain about being overpaid). With turnover rates of 45% in some medical jobs this could result in a substantial cost to the NHS of many tens of millions a year (or more).

The report linked about on Iatrogenesis cites figures of 180,000 up to 1,189,576 deaths a year (in the USA) from Iatrogenic causes. Some of this will be caused by the growth in claims for negligence - the usual law of unexpected consequences. This has people doing more things to cover their backs whilst resulting in a situation in which more errors are made.

A similar issue which has been ignored is that up to 40 people a year are killed by mentally ill people whose care regime has failed.

Given the government's massive concentration on terrorism, one wonders whether that is causing a lack of attention to this substantial issue.


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…