Skip to main content

Byelection Results Thursday 5th July 2007

East Northamptonshire DC, Hihamferrers Lancaster
Conservative Elected unopposed.
Con hold. Last fought 2007.

Gateshead MBC, Dunston and Teams
Lab 793 (62.1; +7.7), LD Michael Ruddy 285 (22.3; +1.6), BNP 131
(10.3; -4.3), Con 69 (5.4; -5.0).
Majority 508. Turnout 20.3%. Lab hold. Last fought 2007.

North Tyneside MBC, St Marys
Con 1992 (76.8; +3.2), Lab 363 (14.0; +2.3), LD David Banks 239 (9.2; -5.4).
Majority 1629. Turnout 37.6%. Con hold. Last fought 2007.

Oldham MBC, Saddleworth West and Lees
LD Barbara Beeley 908 (51.3; -3.7), Lab 416 (23.5; +4.7), Con 243
(13.7; -12.5), BNP 202 (11.4; +11.4).
Majority 492. Turnout 22%. LD hold. Last fought 2007.

Shaw and Crompton PC, West
LD Kirsten Stott 363 (54.6), Ind 235 (35.3), Lab 67 (10.1).
Majority 128. Turnout 17%. LD gain from Con.

I am not sure anyone actually posts local government by-election results to a blog so I might just start doing it.


jonthanfryer said…
No-one does, on a regular basis, as far as I am aware -- so that would be much appreciated, John!

Popular posts from this blog

Standards Board and Ken Livingstone

The link is to the case where Ken Livingstone appealed the decision of the Adjudication Panel for England. The Standards Board and associated Adjudication Panel have done a lot of damage to democracy in the UK. The courts are, however, bringing them into more sanity. The point about Ken Livingstone's case is that it was high profile and he also could afford to appeal. The Standard Board has a problem in that those subject to its enquiries face substantial costs that they cannot claim back. This is an issue that needs further work. In essence the Judge found that what he said brought him into disrepute, but not the office of Mayor. We do need the machinery of the SBE and APE to concentrate on things that matter rather than people being rude to each other.

Problems with Outlook Express - emails lost dbx corruption

In the light of the enthusiasm shown for my post relating to the OCX control that must not be named (and probably Microsoft's most embarrassing error of recent years) I thought I would write someting about Outlook Express. Outlook Express is the email client that comes as part of windows. I use it myself, although I have my emails filtered through a spam filter of my own devising written in java. It takes email off a number of servers using POP3 (Post Office Protocol TCP Port 110) and sends it using SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol port 25). I have recently spent a few hours dealing with the problem that arises when .dbx files get corrupted during compacting. Outlook Express (OE) stores the emails (and other things) in files with the suffix .dbx. Each folder has its own .dbx file. They are stored in hidden directories. This makes it harder to deal with things when OE goes wrong. It is very important to back up your stored *.dbx files as otherwise if you have a disk cra

Statement re False Allegations Campaign

Many people will know that my family and I have been subject to a campaign of false allegations by Esther Baker for the past 4 1/2 years. Yesterday there was a court judgment Baker v Hemming [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB) which formally confirmed that the allegations were false. Esther Baker, who had brought a libel claim against me, dropped her defence of Truth to my counter-claim and was taken by the judge as no longer trying to prove her allegations. Due to Baker's various breaches of court rules and orders, she has been barred from further repeating her allegations even in the court proceedings. Further claim of mine in libel against Baker are ongoing. There is a good summary in the Daily Mail here . This demonstrates the challenge in fighting false allegations in today's Britain. A substantial campaign was built up to promote allegations which had no substance to them. Various Labour MPs and in