Skip to main content

Gas Crisis: Urgent Question

The link is to hansard for my supplementary question to my urgent question about gas.

Basically the situation is that the National Grid are taking gas out of Long Term Storage at the maximum rate. (and did so on Tuesday as well). I quoted the figures for Sat/Sun/Mon.

This is not sustainable and if all else remains equal (viz temperatures remain the same, supply is the same) then we breach the safety monitors and have to start shutting down parts of the network by cutting off people on interruptible supplies (industrial users) in late December early January and keeping them off until March.

Now in my 45 years of life it has generally got colder through that period rather than warmer and I (and the Met office) would expect that.

Hence, unless there is a really good reason to see otherwise, that is likely to happen.

I have now managed to source figures as to the detailed inputs into the system.

Our new LNG system in the Isle of Grain that is supposed to produce 13 mcm/d peaked at 6 and was at 2 on Tuesday. Even if the tankers didn't keep wandering off to Spain this would perhaps give another 10 mcm/d.

The good old interconnector that everyone goes on about was expected to give us 42 mcm/d according to the plans earlier this year. In November it has averaged 22, but on 17/18 it hit 40/41. On Tuesday it was at 33.

Hence you could argue that there is leeway of 11 (LNG)+ 9 (IC)=20 mcm.

We took 54 mcm out of storage on Tuesday. The Rogh LTS has an official maximum of 455 GWh. It has been running at a higher figure than that 469/496/484 (Sun-Tue).

My guess is that has the tap fully open essentially and is maxed out. The pressure peaks at 200 Atmospheres, as the pressure goes down the amount that can come out of this particular source per day will reduce.

There was an interruption warning for Tuesday (South West) and there is one today (North West). Essentially I don't see evidence that anything is going to get substantially better and there is evidence that the weather is going to get worse.

Under average weather conditions, a change in temperature of +/ 1 degree would result in a -/+ 50-60 GWh (5mcm) per day change in demand from domestic GCH consumers. On a typical cold winter day this would probably rise to around 90-120 GWh (10mcm) per day. On an extreme cold 1 in 20 winter day this could be of the order of 160-180 (16mcm) GWh/day

This is the main issue of elasticity in demand. The domestic customers will be primarily on fixed tarrifs, however.

Obviously snow does not help.

On an annual basis the figures for demand are:
Firm supply 625 TWh
Interruptible 105 TWh
Industrials 36 TWh
Power 240 TWh
Export 137 TWh)
(Source National Grid Ten year strategy figures for 2004)

The problem that seriously worries me is that I do not have the figures for the different pattern of demand during winter. Most of the increased demand is domestic.
There is no export.

Gas Consumption by sector in Tera Watt Hours in 2003 was
DomesticIndustryCommercialPowerEnergy Industry
385.985183.305101.825324.863108.171

Without the storage we would be short of the order of 50 mcm (about 550 GWh) a day.
Only 10% of the annual demand (ignoring export) is interruptible and 50 mcm is just under a 1/7th of supply.

That is if everything else remains equal, of course. This still implies a sufficiency for domestic customers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).




Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men:

The Labour Candidate's Book Promotion Tour and Why It Matters

In the 2015 General Election the Labour Candidate criticised John Hemming for having an external interest and made a pledge that she would be a "Full Time MP for Yardley and my only other job will be mom & carer ...".  Here is a copy of that pledge:


Since that point she has been working on paid Television Programmes and has also written a book. John Hemming has made no secret of the fact that he chairs the board of the company he founded in 1983. This involves one meeting a month. When he was the MP for Yardley he was a full time MP and the Job of being MP for Yardley came first. The Labour candidate has reported 1,274 hours of work other than being an MP in the two years she has been elected and her income in the last year was over £131,000.

Ignoring the question as to how she reconciles that with her "pledge" the question is raised as to what extent her external activity conflicts with the role of Member of Parliament for Yardley. She is supposed to de…