Skip to main content

EDM 860 - Internet Access from House of Commons

I placed EDM 860 on the order paper to raise the issue that MPs cannot get email from outside the Parliamentary Estate if they are attached to the Parliamentary Network.

That is because the Parliamentary Communications Department blocks port 110. Quite a few more technically able MPs who handle their own email, rather than having it forwarded to a member of staff, use more advanced systems than are available via the House of Commons.

Having circulated an email to all MPs I find one MP who uses a G3 connection like myself (but a different service provider) finds he has to wander around to get a signal to get his email. Quite a few MPs find that the rules developed by the Parliamentary Communications Department prevent them doing their job properly.

I work hard to make it relatively easy for constituents to contact me. The facilities established at substantial cost to assist this tend to prevent it.

I believe that if enough MPs sign the EDM then some cables will be replugged to make it possible to use the system to a fuller extent.

Comments

Julian Shersby said…
John,

I am a local district councillor and my father used to be an MP for over 25 years (Sir Michael Shersby) and I think the current Parliamentary email arrangements are little short of a disgrace.

For instance over 100 MPs have no personal email address at all and this includes a significant number of government ministers.

I appreciate the potential for spam and so on but there must be ways to try and overcome this and block most potential spam.

As a district councillor all councillors on Mole Valley District Councillors have an email address in the format cllr.bloggs@molevalley.gov.uk which is redirected to whatever real underlying email address councillors want with their own ISP. Also for the three of the 41 councillors who are IT illiterate the emails are directed to our committee services section who print them out and send them to the relevant councillor.

I have tried to discuss this with the Parliamentary IT office who take a very snooty nosed approach that it is not up to them to impose any commonality in email accessibility for MPs.

What you tell me about some MPs not having access to external email if they use the Parliamentary email system is even more alarming. But presumably most MPs redirect to their own ISPs? However where an MP has an email account they do not use like my own MP Sir Paul Beresford (beresfordp@parliament.uk) the account is not disabled but instead accumulates in an ever larger electronic dustbin that will not be accessed. This is the case unless an MP asks for an account they do not want to use to be manually disabled.

Sir Paul only accepts emails addressed to his secretary.

I think the IT staff of the House of Commons must think they are running MI5 rather than a body for whom the primary purpose of life is to communicate with the public.

I hope you manage to get quite a few signatories for your EDM.

By the way have you signed the EDM against 0870 numbers? If not can you please do so:-

Regards,

Julian Shersby
cllr.shersby@molevalley.gov.uk

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…