Skip to main content

Election Results 26th March 2009

North East Lincolnshire UA, Yarborough
LD Peter Bailey 763 (35.8; +4.4)
Con 513 (24.1; -0.3)
Lab 437 (20.5; +2.5)
BNP 370 (17.4; +17.4)
The Generalist Party 49 (2.3; +2.3)
[Ind (0.0; -4.7)]
[Ind (0.0; -21.4)]
Majority 250
Turnout 25.5%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Redditch DC, Headless Cross and Oakenshaw
Con 764 (48.2; -14.7)
Lab 502 (31.7; +8.5)
LD John Stanley 162 (10.2; -3.7)
Green 113 (7.1; +7.1)
Ind 45 (2.8; +2.8)
Majority 262
Turnout 23.2%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Newham LBC, Royal Docks
Lab 723 (46.3; -0.2)
Con 708 (45.4; +13.9)
Christian Peoples Alliance 94 (6.0; -6.2)
Respect 35 (2.2; -7.5)
Majority 15
Turnout 22.8%
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Wolverhampton MBC, Ettingshall
Lab 1274 (58.8; +0.3)
Con 449 (20.7; -3.8)
LD Stephanie Kerrigan 366 (16.9; -0.1)
Ind 77 (3.6; +3.6)
Majority 825
Turnout 25.2%
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Oxford City DC, Headington Hill and Northway
Lab 548 (38.3; +2.0)
Con 443 (31.0; -2.6)
LD Ruth Beer 378 (26.4; +2.4)
Green 62 (4.3; -1.8)
Majority 105
Turnout not known
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Keynsham TC, Keynsham East
Con 584 (43.9)
Ind 314 (23.6)
LD Duncan Hounsell 221 (16.6)
Lab 138 (10.4)
BNP 73 (5.5)
Majority 270
Turnout 30.5%
Con hold

Llandudno TC, Mostyn
Con 217 (43.2)
Lab 123 (24.5)
Ind 83 (16.5)
LD Malcolm Bullock 79 (15.7)
Majority 94
Turnout 19%
Con gain from Lab

Redditch DC, Central
Lab 700 (51.3; +15.2)
Con 511 (37.4; -9.6)
LD Simone Rudge 84 (6.2; -3.5)
Green 36 (2.6; +2.6)
Ind 34 (2.5; -4.7)
Majority 189
Turnout 29.4%
Lab gain from Con
Percentage change is since May 2008

Melton BC, Long Clawson and Stathern
Con 463 (50.7; -6.9)
Ind 231 (25.3; -17.1)
BNP 120 (13.1; +13.1)
Lab 100 (10.9; +10.9)
Majority 232
Turnout 29%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…