Skip to main content

Election Results 5th March 2009

Broadland DC, Buxton date: 05/03/2009
LD Barbara Rix 555 (71.3; +50.4)
Con 201 (25.8; -14.6)
Green 22 (2.8; +2.8)
[Ind (0.0; -38.6)]
Majority 354
Turnout 40%
LD gain from Con
Percentage change is since May 2007

Carlisle City DC, Belah date: 05/03/2009
Con 700 (46.4; -20.3)
Lab 307 (20.3; -3.4)
Ind 221 (14.6; +14.6)
BNP 142 (9.4; +9.4)
LD James Osler 79 (5.2; +5.2)
Green 61 (4.0; +4.0)
[English Democrats (0.0; -9.7)]
Majority 393
Tunout 31.4%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Carlisle City DC, Castle date: 05/03/2009
LD Colin Farmer 465 (36.0; -8.3)
Lab 304 (23.5; 0.0)
BNP 255 (19.7; +19.7)
Con 143 (11.1; -5.2)
Green 125 (9.7; +9.7)
[Ind (0.0; -15.9)]
Majority 161
Turnout 30.4%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

North Warwickshire BC, Atherstone Central date: 05/03/2009
Lab 320 (37.1; -4.8)
Con 221 (25.6; -17.9)
BNP 186 (21.6; +21.6)
Ind 136 (15.8; +15.8)
[LD (0.0; -14.6)]
Majority 99
Turnout 28.8%
Lab gain from Con
Percentage change is since May 2007

Newcastle Under Lyme BC, Ravenscliffe date: 05/03/2009
Con 229 (25.4; -14.5)
Lab 213 (23.6; +1.2)
BNP 180 (20.0; +20.0)
LD John Parsons 149 (16.5; -2.4)
UKIP 131 (14.5; -4.4)
Majority 16
Turnout 26%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Selston PC, Underwood date: 05/03/2009
LD Kelly Jackson 540 (79.2)
Lab 142 (20.8)
Majority 398
Turnout 29.1%
LD hold

Selston PC, Jacksdale date: 05/03/2009
LD Marion Sears-Piccavey 541 (73.6)
Lab 194 (26.4)
Majority 347
Turnout 29.8%
LD gain from Ind

Vale of Glamorgan UA, Llandow / Ewenny date: 05/03/2009
Con 612 (69.6; +3.8)
PC 140 (15.9; -3.4)
Lab 127 (14.4; -0.4)
Majority 472
Turnout 41%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…