Skip to main content

Other payments to MPs and Peers

Whilst people are at it we really should consider what other payments are made to members of the House of Commons and House of Lords. In the lords there is no "salary" only "expenses".


Ministers' and other Office‐holders' salaries: 1 April 2008
Salaries of Ministers and other office‐holders detailed in this table are the maximum available; post holders may accept a lesser salary. Where it has been announced that post holders are drawing a lesser salary this is noted.
Ministers (with the exception of those who are provided with an official residence or any Lords’ Ministers who receive Night Subsistence Allowance) may choose to receive £2,916 London Supplement or, if eligible, to retain the Additional Cost Allowance.

Office‐holders in House of Commons
Ministerial Entitlement (£) Total (including parliamentary salary of £63,291) (£)
Prime Minister 130,959 194,250
Cabinet Minister 78,575 141,866
Lord Chancellor 78,575 141,866
Government Chief Whip 78,575 141,866
Minister of State 40,759 104,050
Parliamentary Under Secretary of State 30,937 94,228
Solicitor General 68,464 131,755
Advocate General 68,464 131,755
Government Deputy Chief Whip 40,759 104,050
Government Whip 26,231 89,522
Assistant Government Whip 26,231 89,522
Leader of the Opposition 72,529 141,820
Opposition Chief Whip 40,759 104,050
Deputy Opposition Chief Whip 26,231 89,522
Speaker 78,575 141,866
Chairman of Ways and Means (Deputy Speaker) 40,759 104,050
First Deputy Chairman of Ways & Means (Deputy Speaker) 35,823 99,114
Second Deputy Chairman of Ways & Means (Deputy Speaker) 35,823 99,114

These are the figures for the House of Lords. Ordinary peers only get paid through "expenses" and have no salary defined as a salary.

Office‐holders in House of Lords (No parliamentary salary)
Ministerial
Entitlement (£)
Lord Speaker 106,653
Cabinet Minister 106,653
Minister of State 83,275
Parliamentary Under Secretary 72,529
Attorney General 111,574
Advocate General 96,854
Government Chief Whip 83,275
Government Deputy Chief Whip 72,529
Government Whip 67,068
Leader of the Opposition 72,529
Opposition Chief Whip 67,068
Chairman of Committees 83,275
Principal Deputy Chairman 77,689

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…