Skip to main content

Results: Thursday 3rd July 2008.

Barking and Dagenham LBC, Chadwell Heath
Con 842 (37.4; +7.5)
Lab 691 (30.7; -7.0)
BNP 564 (25.1; +25.1)
UKIP 142 (6.3; -6.9)
Ind 11 (0.5; -18.7)
Majority 151
Turnout 33.2%
Con gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2006

Bexley LBC, Christchurch
Con 1192 (47.8; -16.1)
LD Oliver Brooks 459 (18.4; +3.5)
BNP 431 (17.3; +17.3)
Lab 411 (16.5; -4.8)
Majority 733
Turnout 29.6%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Corsham TC, Corsham
LD Isabel Langsford 676 (45.1)
Con 399 (26.6)
Ind 172/147/16 (11.5)
BNP 119 (7.9)
Lab 92 (6.1)
Majority 277
Turnout 43.2%
LD gain from Ind

Derbyshire CC, Eckington
Lab 824 (35.9; -15.3)
Con 658 (28.6; +11.0)
Ind 300 (13.1; +4.1)
BNP 253 (11.0; +11.0)
Ind 150 (6.5; -1.7)
LD Frank Higgins 113 (4.9; -9.1)
Majority 166
Turnout 26.6%
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2005

East Grinstead TC, Ashplats
Con 666 (55.0)
LD Tim Wise 489 (40.4)
Green 56 (4.6)
Majority 177
Turnout 30.3
Con gain from LD

Havering LBC, South Hornchurch
Ind 661/17 (27.2; +8.1)
BNP 518 (21.3; +21.3)
Con 438 (18.0; -4.6)
Lab 416 (17.1; -5.8)
Residents 287 (11.8; -12.7)
UKIP 64 (2.6; +2.6)
English Democrats 28 (1.2; +1.2)
Residents Association of London 17 (0.7; -4.5)
Majority 143
Turnout 23.8%
Ind gain from Residents
Percentage change is since May 2006

Mid Sussex DC, Burgess Hill St Andrews
LD Janice Henwood 876 Graham Knight 829 (56.8; +1.3)
Con 561/501 (36.4; +0.5)
Green 65 (4.2; +4.2)
Lab 40 (2.6; -6.0)
Majorities 315/268
Turnout 42.1%
LD hold x 2
Percentage change is since May 2007

North East Derbyshire DC, Killamarsh West
Lab 480 (46.2; -53.8)
Con 342 (32.9; +32.9)
Ind 167 (16.1; +16.1)
LD Terry McElligott 51 (4.9; +4.9)
Majority 138
Turnout 24%
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2007

North East Derbyshire DC, Unstone
LD Gordon Austin 169 (31.2; +31.2)
Con 160 (29.6; +29.6)
Lab 146 (27.0; -13.0)
Ind 66 (12.2; -47.8)
Majority 9
Turnout 38.3%
LD gain from Ind
Percentage change is since May 2007

Rother DC, Bexhill Sackville
Con 571 (49.4; +6.5)
LD Peter Webb 491 (42.5; +5.8)
Lab 93 (8.1; +0.6)
[Ind (0.0; -13.0)]
Majority 80
Turnout 31.5
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…