As with the other reports they find little understandable logic in the judgments of cafcass. It takes a bit of time to understand the importance of this.
In most instances service users did not experience
a service which had been planned systematically by
Family Court Advisers; case planning documents were not
completed or were not comprehensive, for example. Most
files had some case notes, although these were often
illegible. Evidence of assessment, such as evidence of the
Family Court Adviser weighing and analysing the evidence
from interviews, was almost always absent from the case
records. It was therefore not possible to understand how
FCAs were making their judgements.
In most instances service users did not experience
a service which had been planned systematically by
Family Court Advisers; case planning documents were not
completed or were not comprehensive, for example. Most
files had some case notes, although these were often
illegible. Evidence of assessment, such as evidence of the
Family Court Adviser weighing and analysing the evidence
from interviews, was almost always absent from the case
records. It was therefore not possible to understand how
FCAs were making their judgements.
Comments