Skip to main content

BY ELECTION RESULTS 17TH JULY 2008

Derwentside DC, Castleside
Ind 297 (82.3 +8.3)
Con 64 (17.7 +3.7)
Lab [0.0 –12.0]
Majority 233
Turnout 27.49
Ind hold
Percentage change is from 2007

Hillingdon LBC, Townfield
Lab 1031(45.3 –12.6)
LD R Chamdal 506 (22.2 +8.7)
Con 445 (19.6 –9.0)
BNP 186 (8.2 +8.2)
National Front 74 (3.3 +3.3)
Green 33 (1.5 +1.5)
Majority 525
Turnout Not known
Lab hold
Percentage change is from 2006

Redditch BC, Batchley
Con 630 (39.00 –12.4)
Lab 539 (33.4 –4.3)
BNP 299 (18.5 +18.5)
LD R Patrick Taylor 121 (7.5 –3.4)
Ind 25 (1.5 +1.5)
Majority 91
Turnout 27.59
Con gain Lab
Percentage change is from 2008

Wealden DC, Uckfield New Town
LD C J Sweetland 311 (47.4 –16.0)
Con 289 (44.1 +7.5)
UKIP 56 (8.5 +8.5)
Majority 22
Turnout 31.77
LD hold
Percentage change is from 2007

Worcestershire CC, Arrow Valley East
Con 1437 (42.2 +9.9)
Lab 1041 (30.6 –15.8)
LD D Thomas 455 (13.4 –7.9)
BNP 367 (10.8 +10.8)
Ind 103 (3.0 +3.0)
Majority 396
Turnout 19.76
Con gain Lab
Percentage change is from 2005

Comments

Anon said…
Turnout in Hillingdon was 24.97%
according to website-

http://www.hillingdon.gov.uk/index.jsp?articleid=15210

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).




Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men:

The Labour Candidate's Book Promotion Tour and Why It Matters

In the 2015 General Election the Labour Candidate criticised John Hemming for having an external interest and made a pledge that she would be a "Full Time MP for Yardley and my only other job will be mom & carer ...".  Here is a copy of that pledge:


Since that point she has been working on paid Television Programmes and has also written a book. John Hemming has made no secret of the fact that he chairs the board of the company he founded in 1983. This involves one meeting a month. When he was the MP for Yardley he was a full time MP and the Job of being MP for Yardley came first. The Labour candidate has reported 1,274 hours of work other than being an MP in the two years she has been elected and her income in the last year was over £131,000.

Ignoring the question as to how she reconciles that with her "pledge" the question is raised as to what extent her external activity conflicts with the role of Member of Parliament for Yardley. She is supposed to de…