Skip to main content

Thankyou 13,648 times to the people of Yardley

As the newly elected MP for Yardley I am intending to start my campaign of listening to the people of Yardley. Sadly, however, today I need to attend a funeral. The campaign will, therefore, start tomorrow.

Regular readers of this blog may have noticed that I have not posted anything for a few days. I have been a bit busy.

However, normal service will resume in the near future (and hopefully a picture of more of the cats).

Name Party Votes % +/- %
John Hemming Liberal Democrat 13,648 46.4 +8.1
Jayne Innes Labour 10,976 37.3 -9.6
Paul Uppal Conservative 2,970 10.1 -3.0
Robert Purcell British National Party 1,523 5.2 +5.2
Mohammed Yaqub UK Independence Party 314 1.1 0.0
Majority 2,672 9.1
Turnout 29,431 57.7

Comments

Stephen Booth said…
Sir,

Congratulations.
Bob Piper said…
Midlands based Lib Dems are throwing their hats in the air with joy... they're sending him off to London. Although, having heard he intends to continue on the Council, it will be long faces all round there. Presumably there's a small queue of Lib Dem councillors waiting to suck up to Mike Whitby.

Keep the seat warm John, we're having it back!
Fran Oborski said…
Congratulations John on a superb and well deserved win. It's been a long time coming!!!
john said…
Thanks all.

Bob: The Labour Party said this when I won Acocks Green 15 years ago.
PoliticalHack said…
We'll be back. The boundaries change next time round and the forecast battle between Roger Godsiff and John should be most entertaining.

A temporary setback caused by a number of temporary issues. 2009, with Gordon in power, Yardley will come home as the nation swings back to Labour.
frvfvsdvdsv said…
Congratulations John. I have followed your weblog with interest for some time as a 'Brummy in exile' in true-blue Wycombe. I think that you will be a fine MP and predict that you will hold the seat easily next time round!
A C Baker said…
Congratulations.

You should have had at least one more vote, but my postal ballot paper never arrived with me. I have written to the Elections Office to complain, and check if the paper was used.

I'm sorry to have missed your first advice bureau. Is there a Web page I should monitor for information?
john said…
Yours was not the only postal ballot that went astray. Yours was particularly odd in that your partners' arrived and yours did not.

I will be chasing up these issues.

For the moment the MP Advice bureau is Saturday at 11am.
A C Baker said…
Thank you.

My formal request to revert to voting in person, and for confirmation that my ballot was not used, went in the post on Friday! The Elections Office said that only 40,000 postal ballots had been returned to them, despite there being 58,000 registered postal voters locally?

Where do you hold your advice bureau?
john said…
I have edited my blog entry about the advice bureau to ensure that it is clear that it is held in our "centre for world domination" ie at 1772 Cov Road.
A C Baker said…
Many thanks for that.

Estelle Morris held a monthly Friday evening surgery at Cottesbrooke Junior School, near my home. It would take me about 20 minutes to get to the Yardley LibDem office. How soon do you intend to start holding further sessions at locations distributed around the constituency?
john said…
The arrangement to do Saturdays at 1772 is an immediate arrangement. I need to review the best approach for the whole constituency.

Personally I feel it may be better to have a regular and frequent bureau at a central location than to have monthly ones that move around. However, we will probably issue a survey on Focus to find out what the constituents want about this. I will be having a number of meetings on Friday nights in Birmingham so I probably won't do Friday nights.
A C Baker said…
I feel that any reliable schedule of bureaux would work. I suspect that distributed locations would increase participation.

I look forward to the next issue of Focus.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…