Skip to main content

"Political Hack" on wrong tail of cat (I am not Blofeld)

"PoliticalHack" a Labour Party activist who secreted a camera in our underground centre of world domination in Sheldon believes:

Is John Hemming really some kind of Blofeld character? Is the plan for a Birmingham underground system just a cunning distraction from his real plans? An undercover camera took this picture in Yardley yesterday at the Coventry Road office...

To confirm that two of the cats for which I pay the food bills are not white persians here are the photos:
Waif and Kitty are two of the six cats that can be found prowling the Hemming residence from time to time. Neither, as can be seen, are white persians notwithstanding smears from the Labour Party.


PoliticalHack said…
Your figures just don't add up. You claim six, but can only show us two of them. We'll be checking the postal votes for pawprints.
Bob Piper said…
Yes... he's right. There's only two catsd, and only one of them appears to be alive. Look out for "Hemming the cat killer" headlines.
PoliticalHack said…
Look, if someone was boring you senseless about voting fraud and the perceived injustices caused by the DTI, you'd feign death too.
Stephen Booth said…

Should it not be "...two of the cats for whom [you] pay the food bills...". Cats are definately a 'whom' not 'which'.
Ryan said…
May I be one of the first to congratulate you John via your blog.
PoliticalHack said…
It's the cats wot won it.
The voters of Yardley clearly got fed up with you asking, so decided to give the seat to you.
Debt Consolidation Student Debt Consolidation Programs can help you reduce your interest burden by charging an interest rate lower than the rate on your existing loans. Debt consolidation loan can also allow you to make small monthly payments by extending the loan period

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…