Skip to main content

Opening of Parliament

There are many odd customs in Parliament. One is that one can only book a seat if you turn up and put a prayer card in. If you are not, however, in the chamber when it starts sitting then you lose your place.

Together with three other Liberal Democrat MPs from the Year of 2005 I took part of the vigil on the electoral system.

is a photograph of Steve Williams MP for Bristol West and myself.

Whilst uploading the images I found another cat.

Still no white persian though. There are, however, three cats to go.

I have also been sent the press release about the deportation last Sunday from the group that went to Israel. It appears following:
A group of seven women from Birmingham were barred from entering Israel and deported back to Birmingham from Tel Aviv airport last Sunday, after being threatened with imprisonment. They were going to deliver money raised at an ecumenical fundraising meal and money collected by the local Catholic Community for projects working with malnourished children. At the airport they were told that it is illegal to visit the Palestinian Occupied Territories.

As well as visiting holy sites such as the Church of the Nativity, the Holy Sepulchre and Al Aqsa Mosque the women were hoping to visit refugee camps, women’s projects and Israeli citizens working towards peace. The women were going on a tour of the Holy Land organised by the Birmingham Ramallah Twinning Committee, which would have provided opportunities for exploring the development of links with Women’s Groups in Palestine.

Yvonne Washbourne, President of the Birmingham Trades Council and spokesperson for the group said “We very excited about the visit as for most of us this was the first trip to the Holy land. We were shocked when members of the group were interrogated at Tel Aviv airport and the whole group was detained for many hours. We were treated like criminals, all but strip searched and one of our members was denied access to her luggage, which contained necessary medication. We were very frightened and disorientated when we were moved to a nearby detention centre.
We were told that unless we agreed to be put on the first flight back, we could be incarcerated for a week. Israeli security officials would not respond to enquiries from the British Consulate. Our passports were stamped with ‘entry denied’, which will make it difficult for us to return. However, we are determined to visit the Holy land in the near future and will be visiting the Israeli Embassy to obtain assurances that we will be allowed entry when we do. We will also be seeking legal advice about our treatment.”

Kamel Hawwash, Chair of the Birmingham Ramallah Twinning Committee comments,
“Israel’s disgraceful decision to deport the Group, is aimed at hampering our efforts to develop links between Brummees and Palestinians. Israel can do this because it continues to illegally occupy the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem. This means that the outside world has no direct access to the occupied Palestinian areas. We are determined to continue with our peaceful efforts to develop these links. We call on our government to make the strongest possible protest to the Israeli authorities about the treatment of these women and call on Israel to reverse its decision to ban them from entering Israel in the future.”

Background
The idea for the twinning has been developing since it was first suggested during a visit by a group of trade unionists in January 2003. It aims to twin the two cities but also to develop grass root links between organisations including those working in health, education and culture in Birmingham and Ramallah. The Committee is jointly sponsored by the Birmingham Trade Unions Council (BTUC) and the Palestine Solidarity Campaign.

There is a very significant level of support for the twinning initiative. The Committee have been in discussions with the City Council about ideas for developing further links between the two cities.

About one third of Palestinian children are severely malnourished, as Israel tries to stop support and aid from reaching Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza

Four of the women were being sponsored by their Trade Union branches and the others had funded the visit themselves.



Back to me:
I have also confirmed with the Boundary Commission that their next set of proposals for the West Midlands will be reported publicly on 28th June 2005. The importance of keeping Yardley together will be part of my maiden speech which I have now requested from the Speaker's Office.

Comments

A C Baker said…
Many local residents would also like to see constituency boundaries which re-unite Acock's Green. Hopefully, an imaginative solution can found which respects communities as well as statistics.
Bob Piper said…
Oh yes... top of John's list that will be. Just look out for self preservation more like!
john said…
Whatever the solution for the parliamentary boundaries is it will involve 4 wards making up a seat.

That means that Acock's Green ward will all be in one seat.

We are supporting Acock's Green, South Yardley, Sheldon and Stechford (and Yardley North) being in one seat.
PoliticalHack said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
PoliticalHack said…
The only reason for a politician to make a submission to the Boundary Commission is to attempt to sort out the boundaries to their own advantage.

This is not gerrymandering - it is part of the game and we all do it, we just let the Boundary Commission make the decision.

I am, frankly, amazed at the number of signatures that he's managed to obtain to support this campaign of his.

His instinct for self-preservation predates the election - he made it a campaign issue in his Focus 'Election Special.'
john said…
Don't be that cynical. It is worth being cynical, but not too cynical.
Bob Piper said…
Refresh my memory John. Is that the twinning you opposed?
john said…
No its the twinning that I publicly supported (well AFAIK it was reported in the Birmingham Post).
A C Baker said…
I'm eagerly awaiting the outcome of the electoral reform referendum in the Canadian province of British Columbia:
Story from the Global and Mail newspaper

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…