Skip to main content

Is prisoner X a secret prisoner?

I have reasons to believe that someone was recently imprisoned with reporting restrictions relating to their name. This is clearly against the Civil Procedure Rules. However, the fact that a court order is unlawful does not make it unenforceable.

It is, however, relatively difficult to find out if there are reporting restrictions.

Comments

Jake Maverick said…
is it me?

it's more like prisoner X to the power of X, is it not?
Jake Maverick said…
Robert Green just been jailed for a year for talking/ reporting cime (foolish man). I don't know if it's legal to talk about it or not, nor do i give a f***, but any comment?
Jake Maverick said…
is he or she having a tube forced down his/ her throat...? i this considered legal, if the perpetraits of such crime say it is?

personally i dnt eat anything that i haven't produced myself.....i know damn well how disgusting such people are in prisons, hospitals, govt run places...even when it's not deliberate!

and y'know what they say, if it's not on MSM never really happened so....so kinda secret Robert being jailed like that....

and prsioner X....how do you know? about this particular one? something illegal somewhere then...? and i secret guess even European Court not an option...? if it ever was even if known about....
Jake Maverick said…
c'mon, name him/ her....you have 'special powers'.....you've done it before, and this one damnsite more important than som knobhead cheating on his wife/ brother....?

what are the chances most of these prisoners are Muslim or non white...?
kinda just to kill....but you/ they get to defraud more taxpayer money for torturing people, right?
and how many MPs have shares in John Lewis? how come no FOI for that one?

let me guess....no comment!
Jake Maverick said…
and still no comment from anybody else? guess you have to be there to really understand what it is like....

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…