Skip to main content

Is prisoner X a secret prisoner?

I have reasons to believe that someone was recently imprisoned with reporting restrictions relating to their name. This is clearly against the Civil Procedure Rules. However, the fact that a court order is unlawful does not make it unenforceable.

It is, however, relatively difficult to find out if there are reporting restrictions.

Comments

Jake Maverick said…
is it me?

it's more like prisoner X to the power of X, is it not?
Jake Maverick said…
Robert Green just been jailed for a year for talking/ reporting cime (foolish man). I don't know if it's legal to talk about it or not, nor do i give a f***, but any comment?
Jake Maverick said…
is he or she having a tube forced down his/ her throat...? i this considered legal, if the perpetraits of such crime say it is?

personally i dnt eat anything that i haven't produced myself.....i know damn well how disgusting such people are in prisons, hospitals, govt run places...even when it's not deliberate!

and y'know what they say, if it's not on MSM never really happened so....so kinda secret Robert being jailed like that....

and prsioner X....how do you know? about this particular one? something illegal somewhere then...? and i secret guess even European Court not an option...? if it ever was even if known about....
Jake Maverick said…
c'mon, name him/ her....you have 'special powers'.....you've done it before, and this one damnsite more important than som knobhead cheating on his wife/ brother....?

what are the chances most of these prisoners are Muslim or non white...?
kinda just to kill....but you/ they get to defraud more taxpayer money for torturing people, right?
and how many MPs have shares in John Lewis? how come no FOI for that one?

let me guess....no comment!
Jake Maverick said…
and still no comment from anybody else? guess you have to be there to really understand what it is like....

Popular posts from this blog

Standards Board and Ken Livingstone

The link is to the case where Ken Livingstone appealed the decision of the Adjudication Panel for England.

The Standards Board and associated Adjudication Panel have done a lot of damage to democracy in the UK. The courts are, however, bringing them into more sanity.

The point about Ken Livingstone's case is that it was high profile and he also could afford to appeal. The Standard Board has a problem in that those subject to its enquiries face substantial costs that they cannot claim back.

This is an issue that needs further work.

In essence the Judge found that what he said brought him into disrepute, but not the office of Mayor. We do need the machinery of the SBE and APE to concentrate on things that matter rather than people being rude to each other.

Problems with Outlook Express - emails lost dbx corruption

In the light of the enthusiasm shown for my post relating to the OCX control that must not be named (and probably Microsoft's most embarrassing error of recent years) I thought I would write someting about Outlook Express.

Outlook Express is the email client that comes as part of windows. I use it myself, although I have my emails filtered through a spam filter of my own devising written in java. It takes email off a number of servers using POP3 (Post Office Protocol TCP Port 110) and sends it using SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol port 25).

I have recently spent a few hours dealing with the problem that arises when .dbx files get corrupted during compacting.

Outlook Express (OE) stores the emails (and other things) in files with the suffix .dbx. Each folder has its own .dbx file. They are stored in hidden directories. This makes it harder to deal with things when OE goes wrong.

It is very important to back up your stored *.dbx files as otherwise if you have a disk crash/stol…

Statement re False Allegations Campaign

Many people will know that my family and I have been subject to a campaign of false allegations by Esther Baker for the past 4 1/2 years. Yesterday there was a court judgment Baker v Hemming [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB) which formally confirmed that the allegations were false. Esther Baker, who had brought a libel claim against me, dropped her defence of Truth to my counter-claim and was taken by the judge as no longer trying to prove her allegations. Due to Baker's various breaches of court rules and orders, she has been barred from further repeating her allegations even in the court proceedings. Further claim of mine in libel against Baker are ongoing. There is a good summary in the Daily Mail here.

This demonstrates the challenge in fighting false allegations in today's Britain. A substantial campaign was built up to promote allegations which had no substance to them. Various Labour MPs and in pa…