Skip to main content

Pregnancy and Privacy

This week's experience in terms of the media and Emily's pregnancy is a good example to look at from the perspective of privacy legislation.

On Monday I went to the Birmingham's Womens Hospital (previously known as the Maternity Hospital) with Emily to look at the 12 week scans of her pregnancy.

The day afterwards I had a tweet sent to me offering congratulations. On Saturday a journalist from the Sunday Mercury came to ask questions about the pregnancy.

Today it was the front page story of the Mercury and will be in the nationals tomorrow (some of them).

Now the privacy question is whether the law should be such that the journalists should be imprisoned for reporting this. I accept that it is inconvenient for the story to be reported. We had only told our daughter (Isobel) on Friday. Hence to have it published in a newpaper on Sunday is a bit earlier than we would have wished.

However, there is a real danger in controlling what truth is told by the media. I accept that the media should not be allowed to lie about people without regulation. However, there are lots of dangers in preventing them from telling the truth (I have a lot of examples).

From our personal viewpoint it was an irritating day where we needed to accelerate telling people. However, did it really warrant imprisoning journalists. I don't think so. Over to Eady J.

Comments

Jerry said…
John you Stud Muffin,

I agree with you here, there is a time and place for things like this to be out in the open when the people closely involved choose too, makes no difference what I have heard and read lately about it but come on if your not allowed to broadcast first you news then what hope have us mere mortals, John I would be questioning the milkman, bin men and the next door neighbors cat.

Someone is leaking, for gods sake don't call the plumber until paternity test is carried out, no seriously John congrats anyways.
Jake Maverick said…
aye, congrats man...must be nice to have children! are the kid's prints, dna and iris on the database yet? have you had her chipped for 'security'.....?

i agree imprisonment for something like that on a first offence seems to be a lil bit strong....but then again you get a chemical labotomy and life in prison being tortured for defending yourself when attacked in this cuntry......but surely everybody has a right to keep things like that private? should they wish to? reagrdless of who they are or what they do for a living or whether they have any hair or not?
taught to believe it was already law, article 8, DPA or soemthing....and only good manners to seek consent b4 hand? medical records are a damnsite more intimate than nuddy pictures of yourself kept on a phone that u lose/ got stolen.....


do Doctors still even bother taking that 'oath', knowing they wd be forced to break it as soon as they start 'work'....?
Jake Maverick said…
aye, congrats man...must be nice to have children! are the kid's prints, dna and iris on the database yet? have you had her chipped for 'security'.....?

i agree imprisonment for something like that on a first offence seems to be a lil bit strong....but then again you get a chemical labotomy and life in prison being tortured for defending yourself when attacked in this cuntry......but surely everybody has a right to keep things like that private? should they wish to? reagrdless of who they are or what they do for a living or whether they have any hair or not?
taught to believe it was already law, article 8, DPA or soemthing....and only good manners to seek consent b4 hand? medical records are a damnsite more intimate than nuddy pictures of yourself kept on a phone that u lose/ got stolen.....


do Doctors still even bother taking that 'oath', knowing they wd be forced to break it as soon as they start 'work'....?
Jake Maverick said…
i usually dnt waste my time reading tabloid press.....but I am curious though...did Beauty ever turn up alive?

none of my business I know but still wd really like to know....
charlie said…
Who's been imprisoned (last para)? Have I missed something?
Jake Maverick said…
lots of folk getting imprisoned everyday, very often without even a show trial.....
but nobody officially imprisoned with regard to this one though as far as i can figure....

but who is Eady J?
Nestle Company said…
Found this funny video which shows a pregnant mum bonding with her baby. Did you know that 70% of the baby’s brain growth occurs during pregnancy!. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QXxNjF38Ys&feature=youtu.be

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…