John O Shea has said there was something wrong with the phrasing of the question. What exactly is wrong with this:
“At the weekend, National Express group cancelled without consultation the number 41 bus in Birmingham, causing major problems for people in Birmingham.”
“This is symptomatic of a national problem. When will the rest of the country be allowed to use the same system for bus management as exists in London?”
The good news is that we are close now to having a proposal for a replacement service. However, this should not have happened in the first instance.
Comments
It does, however, demonstrate that this is a national problem.
I don't use the 41 service so cannot comment on it.
I have noticed on a number of services (mostly the 37 but that's the service I use the most so obviously I'm more likely to notice things relating to that service) that there seems to have been a reduction in services run by TWM (i.e. National Express Group), that will accept bus passes, which are replaced by independent companies that either do not accept passes at all or only accept the more expensive 'Network' passes which also cover train and Metro travel. This is, I admit, a purely subjective and non-quantitative observation. Might this be related to this undefined national problem?
That is also behind what happens with the passes.
In questions of the prime minister there is a limit as to how much detailed analysis can be spoken of.