Skip to main content

Video of 41 bus question


John O Shea has said there was something wrong with the phrasing of the question. What exactly is wrong with this:

“At the weekend, National Express group cancelled without consultation the number 41 bus in Birmingham, causing major problems for people in Birmingham.”

“This is symptomatic of a national problem. When will the rest of the country be allowed to use the same system for bus management as exists in London?”


The good news is that we are close now to having a proposal for a replacement service. However, this should not have happened in the first instance.

Comments

news editor said…
This comment has been removed by the author.
john said…
In the light of the second part of the question this is quite clear. In any event you would not expect consultation just for one bus to be cancelled.

It does, however, demonstrate that this is a national problem.
Stephen Booth said…
Just looking at the question the two things that leap out at me are that there's a statement of the cancellation of a service being 'symptomatic of a national problem' without a definition of what problem is being referred to or evidence of the problem or why this is a symptom of it, and there is a presumption int he question that at some point in the future the rest of the country will be able to use the same system of bus management as London (whatever that system is).

I don't use the 41 service so cannot comment on it.

I have noticed on a number of services (mostly the 37 but that's the service I use the most so obviously I'm more likely to notice things relating to that service) that there seems to have been a reduction in services run by TWM (i.e. National Express Group), that will accept bus passes, which are replaced by independent companies that either do not accept passes at all or only accept the more expensive 'Network' passes which also cover train and Metro travel. This is, I admit, a purely subjective and non-quantitative observation. Might this be related to this undefined national problem?
john said…
The national problem (outside London) is that there is in fact relatively little bus regulation.

That is also behind what happens with the passes.

In questions of the prime minister there is a limit as to how much detailed analysis can be spoken of.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…