Skip to main content

By Election Results 18th February 2010

Bridgend UA, Pendre
Lab 200 (36.6; -12.7)
LD Anita Dawn Davies 193 (35.3; -15.3)
Ind 68 (12.5; +12.5)
Con 60 (11.0; +11.0)
PC 25 (4.6; +4.6)
Majority 7
Turnout not known
Lab gain from LD
Percentage change is since May 2008

Charnwood BC, Birstall Watermead
Con 674 (47.7; +2.8)
Lab 452 (32.0; +32.0)
BNP 288 (20.4; +20.4)
[LD (0.0; -55.2)]
Majority 222
Turnout 26.94%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007

Leeds City Council, Hyde Park and Woodhouse Ward
Lab 1054 (47.8; +9.4)
LD Michael Taylor 671 (30.5; -10.2)
Con 188 (8.5; +1.2)
Ind 150 (6.8; +6.8)
Green 140 (6.4; -3.7)
[BNP (0.0; -3.4)]
Majority 383
Turnout 14.8%
Lab gain from LD
Percentage change is since May 2008

Liverpool MBC, Fazakerley
Lab 1525 (57.5; 0.0)
LD Graham Seddon 807 (30.5; +11.1)
BNP 234 (8.8; -5.2)
Green 84 (3.2; +1.1)
[Lib (0.0; -2.2)]
[Con (0.0; -4.9)]
Majority 718
Turnout 23%
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

South Hams DC, Ivybridge Filham
LD Tony Barber 379 (44.3; +11.9)
Con 356 (41.6; -26.0)
Lab 121 (14.1; +14.1)
Majority 23
Turnout 21.76%
LD gain from Con
Percentage change is since May 2007

Wychavon DC, Evesham South
Con 358 (52.3; +1.2)
LD Diana Brown 176 (25.7; +2.1)
UKIP 150 (21.9; -3.3)
Majority 182
Turnout 16.26%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007

Chepstow TC, St. Christopher
LD Tony Redhead 195 (62.9)
Con 115 (37.1)
Majority 80
Overall: 16.55% (In-person: 11.67% Postal: 79.85%)
LD hold

Evesham TC, Evesham South
Con 432 (66.6)
UKIP 217 (33.4)
Majority 215
Turnout 16.16%
Con hold

Gainsborough TC, South West
LD Daniel Dand 250 (63.3)
Ind 145 (36.7)
Majority 105
Turnout 10.68%
LD hold

Pontypridd TC, Pontypridd Town
LD Phil Price 196 (31.9)
Lab 188 (30.6)
Monster Raving Looney Party 130 (21.2)
PC 100 (16.3)
Majority 8
Turnout not known
LD gain from PC

Patchway TC, Stoke Lodge
Con 370 (65.4)
Ind 101 (17.8)
LD Ken Graupner 98 (17.3)
Majority 269
Turnout 34.3%
Con hold


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…