Skip to main content

Results: Thursday 29th January 2009.

Hackney LBC, Stoke Newington Central
Lab 1162 (47.8; +2.5)
Green 783 (32.2; +3.3)
LD Karelia Scott-Daniels 297 (12.2; -4.6)
Con 169 (7.0; -2.0)
Direct Democracy 20 (0.8; +0.8)
Majority 379
Turnout 38.0
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Manchester City MBC, Didsbury West
LD Lianne Williams 1439 (55.6; +8.4)
Lab 638 (24.7; +1.8)
Con 336 (13.0; -3.6)
Green 173 (6.7; -3.7)
[UKIP (0.0; -3.0)]
Majority 801
Turnout 26.1%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Newcastle City, Fenham
LD Mitzi Emery 1049 (33.9; -11.8)
Lab 1025 (33.1; -3.3)
BNP 836 (27.0; +18.0)
Con 186 (6.0; -2.9)
Majority 24
Turnout 39.6%
LD gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2007

Redbridge LBC, Valentines
LD Shoaib Patel 963 (36.9; +20.1)
Con 781 (29.9; +10.4)
Lab 756 (28.9; -0.3)
Respect 112 (4.3; +4.3)
[British Public Party (0.0; -3.5)]
[Green (0.0; -9.8)]
[Ind (0.0; -21.2)]
Majority 182
Turnout 29.7%
LD gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2006

Bury St Edmunds TC
LD Allan Jones 246 (45.2)
Con 203 (37.3)
Ind 95 (17.5)
Majority 43
Turnout 17.0%
LD gain from Ind

Haxey PC, Axholme South
LD Don Lange 569 (56.2)
Ind 444 (43.8)
Majority 125
Turnout 27.9%
LD gain from Ind

Marlow TC, North and West
(Details from Maurice Oram)
LD Ivor Coleman 503 (51.2)
Con 480 (48.8)
Majority 23
Turnout 14.5%
LD gain from Con

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).




Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men:

The Labour Candidate's Book Promotion Tour and Why It Matters

In the 2015 General Election the Labour Candidate criticised John Hemming for having an external interest and made a pledge that she would be a "Full Time MP for Yardley and my only other job will be mom & carer ...".  Here is a copy of that pledge:


Since that point she has been working on paid Television Programmes and has also written a book. John Hemming has made no secret of the fact that he chairs the board of the company he founded in 1983. This involves one meeting a month. When he was the MP for Yardley he was a full time MP and the Job of being MP for Yardley came first. The Labour candidate has reported 1,274 hours of work other than being an MP in the two years she has been elected and her income in the last year was over £131,000.

Ignoring the question as to how she reconciles that with her "pledge" the question is raised as to what extent her external activity conflicts with the role of Member of Parliament for Yardley. She is supposed to de…