Skip to main content

Results: Thursday 29th January 2009.

Hackney LBC, Stoke Newington Central
Lab 1162 (47.8; +2.5)
Green 783 (32.2; +3.3)
LD Karelia Scott-Daniels 297 (12.2; -4.6)
Con 169 (7.0; -2.0)
Direct Democracy 20 (0.8; +0.8)
Majority 379
Turnout 38.0
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Manchester City MBC, Didsbury West
LD Lianne Williams 1439 (55.6; +8.4)
Lab 638 (24.7; +1.8)
Con 336 (13.0; -3.6)
Green 173 (6.7; -3.7)
[UKIP (0.0; -3.0)]
Majority 801
Turnout 26.1%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Newcastle City, Fenham
LD Mitzi Emery 1049 (33.9; -11.8)
Lab 1025 (33.1; -3.3)
BNP 836 (27.0; +18.0)
Con 186 (6.0; -2.9)
Majority 24
Turnout 39.6%
LD gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2007

Redbridge LBC, Valentines
LD Shoaib Patel 963 (36.9; +20.1)
Con 781 (29.9; +10.4)
Lab 756 (28.9; -0.3)
Respect 112 (4.3; +4.3)
[British Public Party (0.0; -3.5)]
[Green (0.0; -9.8)]
[Ind (0.0; -21.2)]
Majority 182
Turnout 29.7%
LD gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2006

Bury St Edmunds TC
LD Allan Jones 246 (45.2)
Con 203 (37.3)
Ind 95 (17.5)
Majority 43
Turnout 17.0%
LD gain from Ind

Haxey PC, Axholme South
LD Don Lange 569 (56.2)
Ind 444 (43.8)
Majority 125
Turnout 27.9%
LD gain from Ind

Marlow TC, North and West
(Details from Maurice Oram)
LD Ivor Coleman 503 (51.2)
Con 480 (48.8)
Majority 23
Turnout 14.5%
LD gain from Con


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…