Skip to main content

Results: Thursday 22nd January 2009.

Bexley LBC, East Wickham
Con 798 (26.8; -5.2)
BNP 790 (26.5; +12.4)
Lab 700 (23.5; +1.5)
LD Elizabeth Grace Goodlad 564 (18.9; +2.9)
English Democrats 128 (4.3; -4.9)
[UKIP (0.0; -6.8)]
Majority 8
Turnout 36.9%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2006.

Mid Sussex DC, Bentswood
LD Irene Balls 514 (36.9; +1.4)
Lab 456 (32.7; -2.6)
Con 332 (23.8; -5.4)
BNP 92 (6.6; +6.6)
Majority 58
Turnout 34.3%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2007.

Northampton BC, New Duston
Con 1072 (53.0; +9.7)
Lab 322 (15.9; -1.3)
Ind 320 (15.8; -3.8)
LD Marion Allen-Minney 307 (15.2; +7.0)
[Christian Peoples Alliance (0.0; -1.2)]
[SOS! Voters Against Over Development of Northampton (0.0; -10.6)]
Majority 750
Turnout 32.2%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007.

Knaresborough TC, Knaresborough East
Con 325 (33.7)
Ind 297 (30.8)
LD Sue Vasey 295 (30.6)
Lab 46 (4.8)
Majority 28
Turnout 24%
Con gain from LD

St Annes on the Sea TC, Fairhaven
LD Bob Fielding 239 (45.4)
Ind 107 (20.3)
Common Sense Independent 101 (19.2)
No Description 79 (15.0)
Majority 132
Turnout 22.7%
LD gain from Con

Wootton Bassett TC, Wootton Bassett South
Con 819/803 (52.0)
LD Carole Tan 614/Sheila Jacob 608 (39.0)
UKIP 94/90 (6.0)
Green 47/37 (3.0)
Majorities 205/189
Turnout 29.5%
Con hold x 2


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…