Skip to main content

Results: Thursday 9th October 2008

Bristol UA, St George West
LD Tony Potter 923 (34.0; +9.1)
Lab 816 (30.1; -8.2)
Con 509 (18.8; -18.1)
Ind 257 (9.5; +9.5)
Green 116 (4.3; +4.3)
English Democrats 93 (3.4; +3.4)
Majority 107
Turnout 32.9%
LD gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2007

Cheshire CC, Knutsford
Con 1647 (58.7; +11.4)
LD Caroline Aldhouse 818 (29.1; -2.0)
Lab 342 (12.2; -9.4)
Majority 829
Turnout 28%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2005

Cheshire East UA, Knutsford
Con 1679 (59.7; +2.1)
LD Caroline Aldhouse 817 (29.0; +5.0)
Lab 318 (11.3; -7.2)
Majority 862
Turnout 28%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

East Hampshire DC, Holybourne and Froyle
Con 424 (54.6; -13.6)
LD Dean-Paul Phillips 352 (45.4; +21.6)
[Ind (0.0; -8.0)]
Majority 72
Turnout 35.6%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007

Haringey LBC, Alexandra
LD Nigel Scott 1460 (49.9; -6.0)
Lab 772 (26.4; +5.9)
Con 443 (15.2; +6.3)
Green 221 (7.6; -7.3)
BNP 27 (0.9; +0.9)
Majority 688
Turnout 35%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Isle of Wight UA, Mount Joy
Con 286 (45.5; -2.7)
LD Stephanie Wilmott 155 (24.6; -5.7)
Ind 150 (23.8; +23.8)
Lab 38 (6.0; -12.8)
[Liberal (0.0; -2.6)]
Majority 131
Turnout 31.6%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2005

Kent CC, Herne Bay
Con 2474 (47.7; +10.3)
LD Margaret Flaherty 1524 (29.4; -3.3)
Lab 537 (10.4; -12.8)
BNP 399 (7.7; +7.7)
UKIP 252 (4.9; -1.9)
Majority 950
Turnout 23.2%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2005

Southwark LBC, Rotherhithe
LD Wilma Nelson 1149 (56.8; +9.2)
Lab 618 (30.6; +5.3)
Con 255 (12.6; -4.3)
[Green (0.0; -10.2)]
Majority 531
Turnout 23.8%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Stroud TC, Central
Green 183 (60.6)
LD Graham Lloyd-Jones 119 (39.4)
Majority 64
Turnout 19%
Green hold

Wantage TC, Segsbury
LD Peter Kent 328 (49.8)
Con 201 (30.5)
Lab 130 (19.7)
Majority 127
Turnout 24%
LD gain from Con

West Lindsey DC, Middle Rasen
Con 400 (76.2; +36.5)
UKIP 125 (23.8; +13.4)
[LD (0.0; -49.9)]
Majority 275
Turnout 22.5%
Con gain from LD
Percentage change is since May 2007


Further Result from Howard Middleton

25th September 2008.

Ilkley PC, Ilkley South
Ind 342 (72.0)
LD Vaughan Bruce 133 (28.0)
Majority 209
Turnout 21%
Ind gain from Con.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…