Skip to main content

Results: Thursday 9th October 2008

Bristol UA, St George West
LD Tony Potter 923 (34.0; +9.1)
Lab 816 (30.1; -8.2)
Con 509 (18.8; -18.1)
Ind 257 (9.5; +9.5)
Green 116 (4.3; +4.3)
English Democrats 93 (3.4; +3.4)
Majority 107
Turnout 32.9%
LD gain from Lab
Percentage change is since May 2007

Cheshire CC, Knutsford
Con 1647 (58.7; +11.4)
LD Caroline Aldhouse 818 (29.1; -2.0)
Lab 342 (12.2; -9.4)
Majority 829
Turnout 28%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2005

Cheshire East UA, Knutsford
Con 1679 (59.7; +2.1)
LD Caroline Aldhouse 817 (29.0; +5.0)
Lab 318 (11.3; -7.2)
Majority 862
Turnout 28%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

East Hampshire DC, Holybourne and Froyle
Con 424 (54.6; -13.6)
LD Dean-Paul Phillips 352 (45.4; +21.6)
[Ind (0.0; -8.0)]
Majority 72
Turnout 35.6%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007

Haringey LBC, Alexandra
LD Nigel Scott 1460 (49.9; -6.0)
Lab 772 (26.4; +5.9)
Con 443 (15.2; +6.3)
Green 221 (7.6; -7.3)
BNP 27 (0.9; +0.9)
Majority 688
Turnout 35%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Isle of Wight UA, Mount Joy
Con 286 (45.5; -2.7)
LD Stephanie Wilmott 155 (24.6; -5.7)
Ind 150 (23.8; +23.8)
Lab 38 (6.0; -12.8)
[Liberal (0.0; -2.6)]
Majority 131
Turnout 31.6%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2005

Kent CC, Herne Bay
Con 2474 (47.7; +10.3)
LD Margaret Flaherty 1524 (29.4; -3.3)
Lab 537 (10.4; -12.8)
BNP 399 (7.7; +7.7)
UKIP 252 (4.9; -1.9)
Majority 950
Turnout 23.2%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2005

Southwark LBC, Rotherhithe
LD Wilma Nelson 1149 (56.8; +9.2)
Lab 618 (30.6; +5.3)
Con 255 (12.6; -4.3)
[Green (0.0; -10.2)]
Majority 531
Turnout 23.8%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Stroud TC, Central
Green 183 (60.6)
LD Graham Lloyd-Jones 119 (39.4)
Majority 64
Turnout 19%
Green hold

Wantage TC, Segsbury
LD Peter Kent 328 (49.8)
Con 201 (30.5)
Lab 130 (19.7)
Majority 127
Turnout 24%
LD gain from Con

West Lindsey DC, Middle Rasen
Con 400 (76.2; +36.5)
UKIP 125 (23.8; +13.4)
[LD (0.0; -49.9)]
Majority 275
Turnout 22.5%
Con gain from LD
Percentage change is since May 2007


Further Result from Howard Middleton

25th September 2008.

Ilkley PC, Ilkley South
Ind 342 (72.0)
LD Vaughan Bruce 133 (28.0)
Majority 209
Turnout 21%
Ind gain from Con.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…