Skip to main content

QALY - Quality Adjusted Life Years

NICE use QALYs to calculate the effectiveness of drugs. I heard tonight that someone aged 60 cannot have a QALY of more than 0.6 per year.

This sounds very wrong, but is not clear on the NICE site.

It may be this is the reason why NICE have been so difficult on revealing their formulae.

The challenge now is to get to the Truth.

Comments

Perry Barr Focus Team said…
John, it sounds like utter rubbish. A QALY is based on the quality of life. There is a problem when economists attempt to evaluate the worth of life on the basis of economic contribution. That used to happen in cost-benefit analysis.

The problem with QALYs is that they may value the life of a disabled person as of less quality than a fully abled person. They are also problematic when aggregated over a long time period. That may be the source of your rumour because it may be that some analysts assume that quality of life will decline with extended age. However future QALYs are also discounted - just the same as any future economic costs or benefits - and to assume declining quality of life seems to me to be double-counting. Indeed should a conventional discount rate be used?
Jon
1:29 pm
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

NHS reorganisation No 3,493,233

Followers of my blog will have seen the NHS question about how many reorganisations have we had. We've yet another. The number of PCTs (Primary Care Trusts) nationally is to halve. This means merging East and North. (and then probably HoB and south). It would be nice if people would stick with one structure. There is a quotation ( Which sadly does not appear to be a true quotation ) We trained hard . . . but it seemed that every time we were beginning to form up into teams we would be reorganized. I was to learn later in life that we tend to meet any new situation by reorganizing; and a wonderful method it can be for creating the illusion of progress while producing confusion, inefficiency, and demoralization. But has to have been originated by someone. The web link shown goes through the derivation which appears to be more linked to an anonymous British Soldier WW2 than any Roman or Greek General called by a name perming 2 out of (Gaius, Galus, Petronius and Arbiter). From the...
2 comments
Read more