Skip to main content

Electronic Voting in Holland

The link is to a story as to how it was proven that electronic voting is unreliable and opaque in Holland.

Comments

Mr Glyn said…
They are going to use e-counting in the London election coming up in the 2 May election.

Last year I was one of the Open Rights Groups election observers watching every thing go wrong with the e-voting and e-counting trails across England and Scotland.

The e-counting company that will be running the London elections was the company that ran the Beckland election in 2007. Breckland's Dereham-Humbletoft ward, the one ward in England that was counted both electronically and manually, was found to have 56.1% more District Council votes than when e-counted. I think thats worth repeating they managed to miss over half the votes while e-counting. We will not see that this time, because they have refused to do a manual recount of even a tiny percentage of the votes, some thing that ORG is asking them to do to check that the machines can be trusted.

I expect that on the night I will have to once again file an election observers report that says "I hope the election was fair but I have no way of telling it was."

P.S.
If you want to read more on the things that went wrong on the May 2007 election check out the Open Rights Groups election report.

Just picking randomly look at page 52, where the SNP nearly lost the Scottish election because of the width of a laptop screen and Excel, or page 23 of the picture of the web based voting in Rushmore where the ballet was changed so that the Conservative candidate had a Labour logo next to his name and the phrase "Conservation Party Candidate" under his name instead of "Conservative Party Candidate".

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…