Skip to main content

A sad story (Jonathan Phillips)

The link is to a story in the Daily Mail about how the system has now caused the destruction of a family.

It is important to understand how some social workers deliberately set out to upset parents in the hope of getting a reaction that they can then use against the parents in the courts. The unannounced visit is one trick used to upset mothers.

Still another baby for the government's adoption targets.

Comments

moira said…
I agree.Social workers have a plethora of dirty tactics they use to get what they want.If anyone thinks this is paranoid they should talk to family solcitors who deal with their tricks all of the time.

When social services came round with the police threatening to break down the door,I fought them all. I said you bitch you are taking my child.She gave a huge grin. I later realised its because she had got what she wanted. She made a whole case out of me losing my temper and saying I was volotile.In fact this is the first time I ever went for anyone. They did this illegally and are going to get held to account.

I really pity this solicitor as these social services staff really bully and abuse parents,as they know they have got your child,and if you say anything you can lose your child.Its a hideous abuse of power and parents have got nowhere to turn except a social services complaints system. Which is as dodgy as the present system and impossible to access.

I wish the judge would realise how stressful and awful it is to deal with a system that doesnt listen. The wife has depression yet is being made out to be seriously mentally ill.
This is another tactic they use.To exaggerate a mothers mental health problems until it doesnt resemble a treatable illness that gets better in time.

They are truly frightening and the courts need to be open to see how they are destroying families like this.The man has now lost his job.

It wouldnt surprise me to learn that the family had gone to social services for a bit of support or respite and SS have repaid trust and totally destroyed their lives in the process.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…