Skip to main content

A Saudi view on Oil Production

Sadad Al Husseini was head of exploration and production for Aramco (the Saudi oil company). He has presented recently at the Oil and Money conference in London.

He also has information on David Strahan's site. One part about reserves and another podcast about general issues.
[David Strahan did a presentation at the first APPG OPO meeting.]

Key points on these are:
The world’s proved reserves have been have been falsely puffed up by the inclusion of 300 billion barrels of speculative resources, according to the former head of exploration and production at Saudi Aramco, and this explains the industry’s inability to raise output despite soaring prices.

One simplistic, but not unreasonable system for predicting production is to take the total producable reserves and halve them. This, therefore, knocks off about 4-5 years of production.

I have also extracted the following from the podcast:
Every indication is that the increasing prices that we haev been seeing are part of a trend. You cannot put a control on the ceiling, but you can predict that the floor on oil prices in the next 4-5 years a little bit more dollars per barrel per year. In 2010 the floor may well be $100

Now the technical floor should have been around $70. If you persist the way we do
unless you have a global recession prices will increase. There is no spare capacity of any significance and therefore the factors that are driving oil price up will continue.

What we have seen is that although the price of oil has almost quadrupled. The supply has not. The non opec not Former Soviet Union has gone down.


All of the large fields are maturing. The additional discoveries are less sustainable. All these factors put together have put a ceiling on production. More appropriately a plateau sustainable for 10-15 years.

The evidence is that inspite of the large increases in oil prices we have been unable to match with increasing capacity.

In my own modelling of the resources I cannot see additional resources coming online to sustain the plateau.

As far as the conventional oil resources I cannot see that they will be sustainable beyond that time frame.

Saudi Arabia has a large number of very giant fields. Many of these international organisations have assumed that Saudia Arabia will double its production. That is unrealistic. Some of those assumptions assume that opec will go from 30 mbd to 45-60 bd. That is what I am calling unrealistic.

Staying at 30mbd is not a small feat. To stay there requires a massive sustained investment programme.


This fits with the German predictions. What it means is that the problem is going to have a real effect from now on in.

Comments

Scog Blog said…
John,

Please forgive me as this comment has nothing to do with the above.

Please tell me how I can get involved and support your campaign against the medieval practices of the family court and social sevices.

I am a mother of two with a former history of mental health problems and after seeing 'This Morning' I am terrified and furious at the powers of these institutions.

I can't believe that after the discrediting of doctor evidence in recent high profile cases that these abuses are still allowed to happen.

How can a doctor who has never met an individual give out such a a devastating judgement. He should be struck off immediately.

Please tell me how i can do something, anything to help.

You can contact me via blogspot.

www.blogsprogress.blogspot.com

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…