Skip to main content

Fran Lyon on "This Morning" - ITV

The link is to Fran's story on "This Morning".

Denise Robertson said:"I was scared because it seemed so cold so remorseless. I can't understand why the public are not rising up about what is going on. We know this is happening. We have talked about it. Fran's an example. The message that is going out there to young girls is "do not tell" because it will be held against you.

"I cannot understand why people are not getting behind John Hemming's campaign. We have had so much sympathy, quite rightly, for the McCanns, but I cannot see the difference between a child being abducted by a stranger and being abducted by the state. To me the loss, the pain is identical.

"I think that the family court always without exception takes the word of social services and rubber stamps what is put in front of them. On this programme some while ago I appealed to hear from someone who had been to the family court who had had the situation reversed to write to me I have not had one letter yet i have had letters piled like this from people in the same position but are gagged because the baby's in the world. Once the baby's in the world we can't help her because there will be a gag put on her and even when people write to me they are breaking the law. This cannot be right. This is acountry where you are innocent until proven guilty and I cannot undersatnd why mothers and grandmothers with their babies on their knees are not saying that we have to write to our MP we have to write to a newspaper.

"Some babies must be taken away because it is right and proper.

"I've got a grandmother in touch with me at the moment who she has been allowed to adopt the three older children who are tots, the pretty blond baby is going to be adopted. Why she is either fit to take them or she isn't. She wants to keep her family together. She is either a fit person or she is not. To say she is fit for the ones she might have difficulty in adopting, but this one she isn't fit to look after. That can't be right. "

Comments

Anonymous said…
Denise Robinson is right - 10 years of campaigning about this, 10 years of being ignored and I will say what I always say to the parents who come to me because they need help and ask "why me?"

"Why me?" Because when it was happening to somebody else you turned a blind eye!

And that is apathetic Britain.
moira said…
When Denise says why don't more mothers with babies on their laps take note.Maybe its because they have got their babies that they don't care about others.

Also there are many people out there that think social services are in always in the right,and always do whats in the best interests of the child.That there must be a sinister reason why people like Fran etc are under threat of losing a child. I find this attitude quite common from people that have no experience of SS.

It doesn't help when people can't publish their experiences of the courts and childrens services.

Lord Falconer is ready to sue Brown over his huge pension and that toerag has made sure this system will continue.

there are so many unfeeling people in this system and I wonder how they sleep at night.
mwianadl said…
Secret family courts at it again?.....or perhaps still at it. Social workers under pressure from their managers to meet targets, keep parents with money who want to adopt happy and to keep foster carers in a job. Foster carers with no children to foster will have to get a real job.

Parents who don't want to look after children will give them away. Parents who want to keep their children should not be forced to accept child removal.

Family courts are now way to scared to open up because as soon as the public know the truth, Judges and social workers will become public targets.

I hope the do-gooders thinking they are helping, experience the loss that parents feel to allow them to know that their do-gooder intention is warped and WRONG.

Parents should be offered help and support. Courts should NOT be involved unless it's a criminal court with a jury.
missemmag said…
My niece put her daughter in to care as she felt she wasn't fit enough at the time to care for her. She was told she could take her home at any time. since then she has been to a phsyciatrist, got herself a flat and done everything else asked of her in order to get her daughter back. but the social services are trying to have her child addopted and she is facing a court hearing. she feels like there's no more she can do and is helpless in getting her daughter back home. Even the foster parents are suprised that this has went on so long (almost 2 years) any suggestions for help would be very appreciated. Emma, Glasgow (my niece lives in England)
john said…
You need to email me about this on hemmingj@parliament.uk

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…