Skip to main content

Sunday's telegraph on George Hibbert

The link is to another mother's story about George Hibbert and comments by one of his erstwhile employees.

This story about the abuse of the hague convention, however, is more of a live issue.

Comments

Jake Maverick said…
what kind of an idiot would vacum the stairs whilst holding a child? surely that is extremely dangerous?

dread to think what wd have happened to both victims if the older victim refused to put the other victim in danger like that.....

and unpredictable? you mean she's a human being? surely anyone who goes around claiming he has the ability to predict people's behaviour then meat out punishments when he's wrong...needs to be locked up, surely?
dread to think if u try and reason with one of these people! I do know actually....can still remember soem of it!
& that confidentiality crap again? why does that not apply when it comes to publsihing EVETYBODYS details on the Internet, unless you're famous like John presumably....or telling it to anybody else that asks, poolice, mixed with half truths lies, leave out basic facts.....

even if he is struck off he's till a millionaire out of it. reminds of that school teacher....worked for the state all his life then on retirement admitted he fabricated all his ualificatiosnto get job in the first place! that's caalled fraud and after nearly sixty yeaars off it....i want every penny he's still got left, including the hirt off his back and jailed for the rest of his life....

they're even travelling abroad now to abduct foriegners

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/9177265/UK-social-workers-snatch-a-child-from-France.html

make a change from dropping bombs on them i suppose!umed
Jake Maverick said…
oops, didn't read the seccond link until i posted that....no chance of having those 'law breakers' prosecuted then? promotion presumably, that is SOP

and this on top of the taxpayer funded jolly and i bet they maxed out on the booze and fags allowance to
Jake Maverick said…
bloody hell! that was quick! u must be online! and no you don't have to publish that one.....
Jake Maverick said…
is there anybody on the govt payroll ho doesn't lie? torture, rape and murder? have you managed to weedle ll the 'corrupt' i.e. decent one's out yet?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/man-whose-wmd-lies-led-to-100000-deaths-confesses-all-7606236.html
Jake Maverick said…
i know, hearsay and i am generally (aat least like to think) a better man than those employed by the system.....but he is, quite clearly, a danger to otherpeople including children, if not to himself....so why the fuck has he not been sectioned already?

and GMC? why are they still denying that the one's that totured me aren't even on the medical reigsiter? go figure...

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).

KING’S BENCH DIVISION

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

LORD HEWART CJ:
It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…