Skip to main content

Election Results this week

Redcar and Cleveland BC, Dormanstown
Eric Howden LD 805 (52.3; +27.2)
Lab 515 (33.5; -18.6)
BNP 145 (9.4; +9.4)
Con 73 (4.7; -18.0)
Majority 290
Turnout 29.88%
LD gain from Lab
Percentage change from 2007

Brighton and Hove City Council, Goldsmid
Green 1,456 (38.5; +17.2)
Con 1,104 (29.2; +1.1)
Lab 816 (21.6; -4.4)
Howard Spencer LD 280 (7.4; -7.8)
UKIP 129 (3.4; +3.4)
[Ind (0.0; -9.5)
Majority 352
Turnout 32.85%
Green gain from Con
Percentage change is since 2007

Stockport MBC, Reddish North
Lab 1,218 (49.5; +1.0)
Con 403 (16.4; -8.9)
UKIP 342 (13.9; +13.9)
Norman Beverley LD 303 (12.3; +0.7)
BNP 195 (7.9; -6.6)
Majority 815
Turnout 23.5%
Lab hold
Percentage change since 2008

Wellingborough BC, Swanspool
Con 548 (46.0; -9.6)
Lab 361 (30.3; -14.0)
Daniel Jones LD 162 (13.6; +13.6)
BNP 120 (10.1; +10.1)
Majority 187
Turnout 27.4%
Con hold
Percentage change since 2007

Brent LBC, Wembley Central
Afifa Pervez LD 1,195 (41.3; -5.2)
Lab 934 (32.3; -9.0)
Con 423 (14.6; +2.4)
Ind 240 (8.3; +8.3)
Green 100 (3.5; +3.5)
Majority 261
Turnout 29.28%
Lib Dem hold
Percentage change is since 2006

Huntingdonshire DC, Ramsey
UKIP 753 (39.2; +17.4)
Con 569 (29.6; -16.6)
Ind 303 (15.8; +15.8)
Melanie Jane Allgood LD 295 (15.4; -11.8)
[Lab (0.0; -4.8)]
Majority 184
Turnout 30.14
UKIP gain from LD
Percentage change from 2008

Cambridgeshire CC, Ramsey
UKIP 865 (45.3; +45.3)
Con 682 (35.7; -10.6)
Anthony Bell Hulme LD 308 (16.1; -21.5)
Lab 53 (2.8; -13.3)
Majority 183
Turnout 30.14%
UKIP gain from Con
Percentage change is since 2005

Huntingdon TC, North
Patricia Ellen Shrapnel LD 242 (41.2)
Con 207 (35.3)
Lab 138 (23.5)
Majority 35
Turnout 30.14%
LD hold

Derbyshire Dales DC, Winster & South Darley
Lab 426 (62.6; +32.9)
Con 255 (37.3; -6.7)
[LD (0.0; -26.2)
Majority 171
Turnout 48.4%
Lab gain from Con
Percentage change is from 2007


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

I have only just found this one which I think is accurately reported below (but if it is not please give me an accurate report).


R v SUSSEX JUSTICES ex p McCARTHY [1924] 1 KB 256

November 9 1923

Editor’s comments in bold.

Here, the magistrates’ clerk retired with the bench when they were considering a charge of dangerous driving. The clerk belonged to a firm of solicitors acting in civil proceedings for the other party to the accident. It was entirely irrelevant that there had been no evidence of actual influence brought to bear on the magistrates, and the conviction was duly quashed.

It is clear that the deputy clerk was a member of the firm of solicitors engaged in the conduct of proceedings for damages against the applicant in respect of the same collision as that which gave rise to the charge that the justices were considering. It is said, and, no doubt, truly, that when that gentleman retired in the usual way with the justices, taking with him the…

Statement re Police investigation into Harassment and Perverting the Course of Justice.

It was recently reported that the police were not investigating the allegations of Perverting the Course of Justice that I had made. This came as a surprise to me as I had been told for some time that my allegations were to be considered once the VRR had been rejected. I have now had a very constructive meeting with Staffordshire police on Friday 29th June 2018 and the misunderstandings have been resolved. At that meeting the evidence relating to the perversion of the course of justice and the harassment campaign against my family were discussed. The police have decided to investigate both the perversion of the course of justice and also the harassment campaign. I would like to thank them for changing their decision and I accept their apology for the way in which they did that. I am also in possession of written confirmation a police force would be investigating allegations that a vulnerable witness has been harassed for trying to expose the campaign against me. I hope that the aut…