Skip to main content

Don't protest about Childrens Services or the state will section you and silence you

What I find particularly concerning about the linked article is the way in which the father concerned was silenced as a result of being wrongly sectioned.

Comments

Unknown said…
This is similar to "mental capacity" cases, the story is shocking.

This is all down to snooping gone to far, this country is hardly worth saving, might as well abandon ship.
Jerry said…
John and Andrew,

Like in the related article, I would like to find some way in finding out just how many of these cases have the similar "mental Capacity" hogwash thrown at them.

again in the article is it the same in a sense as our own case, although I have not been sectioned, mind you I am not far off, god it will give them all they need
Just Us said…
John, Re couple who fled to Ireland and had their child abducted by Social Services.

The Irish system is far more corrupt than the U.K. In fact half of the Social Workers in Ireland are U.K. Citizens who fled the U.K when the Standards were changed a few years ago. No longer qualified in the U.K. they were snapped up by the HSE in Ireland.

I'm sorry to say that this couple will likely lose their child by adoption. Look at the recent case in the U.K. with Baby Crystal where a mother lost her child even though she had "never come to the attention of CAFCAS".

These injustices are not limited to the U.K. and Ireland it's a problem in the U.S.A., Canada and Australia. The U.N. Treaty on the Rights of the Child is just nonsence that is ignored by all parties who signed up to it.

The only answer to these Secret Courts or "perjury palaces" is to just scrap the whole system and let the Police and Criminal Courts look after Family issues. Any system that does far more harm than good and only gets it right less than 3% of the time needs to be scrapped.

I applaud your work and I respect your efforts in trying to get Justice for Children but I think you will find, as I did, that Justice for Families doesn't exist. In only 1 of every 184 cases where children are taken into "Care" is a parent even even charged with a criminal offense but all 184 are treated as guilty.

20 Children have died in "Care" in Ireland in the last 6 years, I would imagine the numbers in the U.K. are in the hundreds, 20 is 3 times more than who died at the hands of their parents.

Do me a favour and ask the question in the House, how many died and how many were assaulted, the question came up here last week.

I wish you luck, don't give up, eventually these criminals will be brought to Justice and the Taxpayers will fork out billions to the hundreds of thousands of victims they've created along the way. Regards, J
John Hemming said…
I disagree with your comments about Ireland. Ireland's law protects legitimate children from adoption.

I don't know about the numbers of deaths in care in Ireland. There will always be some children that die. The question is why. The figure in England is reported at around 100 a year.
Unknown said…
Rest assured you are not alone. What is happening in our countries is the heinous of all crimes unfortunately at the expense of the lives of innocent children and their families. Since President Clinton signed into law the landmark Adoption and Safe Families Act of 1997 to help thousands of children waiting in foster care move more quickly into safe and permanent homes,more and more families are being unjustly torn part. Financial incentives were put into place subsidizing the state with $4000 to $6000 per child kept in the sysytem and adopted out. This overwhelmingly bipartisan legislation was based in large part on the recommendations of the President's "Adoption 2002" report. The report takes its name from one of the President's central goals -- to at least double the number of children adopted or permanently placed to 54,000 by the year 2002. The Act makes sweeping changes in federal law on adoption and foster care enacted in 1980. While it seems the new law clarifys that the health and safety of children must be the paramount concerns of state child welfare services, you couldn't be further from the truth. The Adoption and Safe Families Act only made an already bad situation, worse. It is a gross violation of our constitutional rights; the department of children and family services and children's courts makes a mockery of our judicial sysytem. There is no due process or equal protection of the law. In Children's courts, social workers and other state employees perjure themselves under oath and are not admonished. They are immune from all liability, furthering their over zealous carriage of power. They arrive at your door from a referal from the child abuse hotline; a call that could have been made from a disgruntled neighbor or a jealous ex. it doesn't matter because they too are granted annonymity. There are no search warrants presented, but they intimidate you into letting them into your homes. This is illegal. But you have nothing to hide because you have done nothing wrong;so you let them in. but if you have dishes in the sink the report will most likely read;
dirty dishes in the sink, growing bacteria and fungus, cock roaches, etc... deeming it unsafe for the child to remain at home. That is what they will do. Then they place your child, who is already terrified and full of separation anxiety at having been removed from their parents, in a "licensed" child care facility usually a foster home where they are often molested, raped, killed or doped with Psychiatric drugs without obtaining your consent.
The social worker begins the family reunification plan which is a bunch of bullshit. The last thing they want is to reunite you with your child. They want to keep your child because it enables them to keep their jobs.
It's nothing less than racketeering for the profit of money. No, not all social workers and judges are unjust, but the majority unfortunately are and nothing will ever change if we as a people unite and fight for the sanction of the family unit, the moral fiber of society.

Popular posts from this blog

Standards Board and Ken Livingstone

The link is to the case where Ken Livingstone appealed the decision of the Adjudication Panel for England. The Standards Board and associated Adjudication Panel have done a lot of damage to democracy in the UK. The courts are, however, bringing them into more sanity. The point about Ken Livingstone's case is that it was high profile and he also could afford to appeal. The Standard Board has a problem in that those subject to its enquiries face substantial costs that they cannot claim back. This is an issue that needs further work. In essence the Judge found that what he said brought him into disrepute, but not the office of Mayor. We do need the machinery of the SBE and APE to concentrate on things that matter rather than people being rude to each other.

Problems with Outlook Express - emails lost dbx corruption

In the light of the enthusiasm shown for my post relating to the OCX control that must not be named (and probably Microsoft's most embarrassing error of recent years) I thought I would write someting about Outlook Express. Outlook Express is the email client that comes as part of windows. I use it myself, although I have my emails filtered through a spam filter of my own devising written in java. It takes email off a number of servers using POP3 (Post Office Protocol TCP Port 110) and sends it using SMTP (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol port 25). I have recently spent a few hours dealing with the problem that arises when .dbx files get corrupted during compacting. Outlook Express (OE) stores the emails (and other things) in files with the suffix .dbx. Each folder has its own .dbx file. They are stored in hidden directories. This makes it harder to deal with things when OE goes wrong. It is very important to back up your stored *.dbx files as otherwise if you have a disk cra

Statement re False Allegations Campaign

Many people will know that my family and I have been subject to a campaign of false allegations by Esther Baker for the past 4 1/2 years. Yesterday there was a court judgment Baker v Hemming [2019] EWHC 2950 (QB) which formally confirmed that the allegations were false. Esther Baker, who had brought a libel claim against me, dropped her defence of Truth to my counter-claim and was taken by the judge as no longer trying to prove her allegations. Due to Baker's various breaches of court rules and orders, she has been barred from further repeating her allegations even in the court proceedings. Further claim of mine in libel against Baker are ongoing. There is a good summary in the Daily Mail here . This demonstrates the challenge in fighting false allegations in today's Britain. A substantial campaign was built up to promote allegations which had no substance to them. Various Labour MPs and in