Skip to main content

Results: Thursday 25th September 2008.

Camden LBC, Hampstead Town
LD Linda Chung 1242 (44.1; +11.5)
Con 1114 (39.6; -6.9)
Lab 289 (10.3; -1.0)
Green 140 (5.0; -3.3)
BNP 29 (1.0; +1.0)
[Ind (0.0; -1.3)]
Majority 128
Turnout 36.7%
LD gain from Con
Percentage change is since May 2006

Chiltern DC, Chalfont St Giles
Con 927 (68.1; +0.6)
LD Paul Meakin 434 (31.9; -0.6)
Majority 493
Turnout 25.4%
Con hold
Percentage change is since May 2007

Greenwich LBC, Plumstead
Lab 1318 (59.1; +12.4)
Con 542 (24.3; +1.5)
LD Leonie Barron 195 (8.7; -10.6)
Green 175 (7.8; +7.8)
[Ind (0.0; -11.2)]
Majority 776
Turnout 21.5%
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2006

Stevenage BC, Pin Green
Lab 716 (54.4; +6.9)
Con 321 (24.4; -5.1)
LD Gordon Knight 112 (8.5; -2.8)
UKIP 85 (6.5; +6.5)
Free England 81 (6.2; -5.4)
Majority 395
Turnout not known
Lab hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Swale BC, Minster Cliffs
Con 549 (48.0; +1.6)
Sheppey First 328 (28.7; +28.7)
Lab 204 (17.8; +1.8)
LD Dave Manning 63 (5.5; -25.9)
[The official Monster Raving Loony Party (0.0; -6.2)]
Majority 221
Turnout 19.8%
Con gain from Sheppey First
Percentage change is since May 2008

Swale BC, Sheerness East
Lab 326 (38.5; +6.7)
LD Colin Howe 177 (20.9; +10.0)
Con 173 (20.4; -1.8)
Sheppey First 171 (20.2; -14.9)
Majority 149
Turnout 23.1%
Lab gain from Sheppey First
Percentage change is since May 2007

Wealden DC, Alfriston
LD Andy Watkins 495 (51.6; +23.4)
Con 465 (48.4; -23.4)
Majority 30
Turnout 48.0%
LD gain from Con
Percentage change is since May 2007

Winchester City DC, Colden Common and Twyford
LD Daryl Henry 1180 (54.1; +1.1)
Con 938 (43.0; -1.6)
Lab 64 (2.9; +0.5)
Majority 242
Turnout 51%
LD hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Abergavenny TC, Priory
LD Melissa Toombs 175 (50.3)
Con 115 (33.0)
Ind 58 (16.7)
Majority 60
Turnout 23%
LD gain from Lab

Bognor Regis TC, Pevensey
Con 266 (31.7)
LD David Meagher 249 (29.7)
Lab 191 (22.8)
BNP 132 (15.8)
Majority 17
Turnout 20.7%
Con hold


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…