Skip to main content

Election Results: Thursday 18th September 2008.

Glasgow City UA, Baillieston
SNP 2318 (45.3, +12.1)
Lab 2167 (42.3, -3.7)
Con 259 (5.1,-1.4)
LD David Jackson 159 (3.1,-0.7)
BNP 73 (1.4,+1.4)
SSP 58 (1.1,-5.6)
Green 45 (0.9,-0.8)
Ind 43 (0.8,-1.3)
Turnout 22.7%
SNP hold
The election was held under the AV system and the winner was elected at the 9th stage. Percentage change are on 1st preferences since May 2007 when the ward elected 2 Labour and 2 SNP councillors.

Leeds City MBC, Farnley and Wortley
Green 1183 (27.1, -17.5)
LD Rosie Spencer 1151 (26.3, +22.2)
Lab 1009 (23.1, +1.1)
BNP 556 (12.7,-1.1)
Con 428 (9.8, -5.2)
Ind 45 (1.0, -0.5)
Majority 32
Turnout 24.8%
Green hold
Percentage change is since May 2008

Pembrokeshire UA, St Dogmaels
Ind 496 (55.7, +17.4)
LD Elfyn Rees 177 (19.9, -41.8)
Ind 160 (18.0, -20.3)
Con 57 (6.4, +6.4)
Majority 319
Turnout 49.3%
Ind gain from LD
Percentage change is since May 2008

Rothwell TC, Trinity
Con 477 (52.5%)
Lab 373 (41.0%)
LD Daniel Garside 59 (6.5%)
Majority 104
Turnout 31.0%
Conservative hold

Suffolk CC. Woodbridge
LD Caroline Page 970 (41.8,+2.3)
Con 826 (35.6, -4.4)
Ind 378 (16.3,+16.3)
Lab 147 (6.3, -14.2)
Majority 144
Turnout 37.2%
LD gain from Con

Percentage change is since May 2005

Suffolk Coastal DC, Woodbridge Riverside
Con 313 (46.0, -8.5)
LD Guy Jewers 254 (37.4,+13.1)
Green 57 (8.4, -3.5)
Lab 56 (8.2, -1.1)
Majority 59
Turnout 42.9%
Conservative hold

Percentage change is since May 2007

Woodbridge TC, Riverside
Con 263 (43.3%)
LD Vic Harrup 246 (43.3%)
Lab 59 (10.4%)
Majority 17
Turnout 43.7%

Conservative hold


Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…