Skip to main content

Really Simple Syndication (RSS)

I have been using Bloglines to link together my main news sources. Those are the BBC website and various blogs.

I particularly like the NHS Blog Doc, Coppers Blog and Frank Chalk for a perspective on public service.

As far as Politics goes I look at Recess Monkey, Guido Fawkes and Iain Dale.

Locally I look at Labour Councillor Bob Piper andPolitical Hack UK an anonymous Labour activist who is now I believe in Hall Green Constituency, but he might be in mine.

I also look at the Lib Dem Aggregator.

I have, however, just installed an online reader. This should download new stories from each of the above sites at a given frequency. The challenge for life and particulary as an elected politician is to handle all the contacts you get so that the important ones (such as those from constituents) are dealt with properly and others dealt with appropriately - which for most generalised bumpf means rapid recycling. (The circular green file).

At the same time you need to remain up to speed with what is happening. As far as I am concerned I then try to free up time to make things happen. That means initiating things. Things like the OFT reference take quite a bit of work from me personally hence I need to handle everything else as efficiently as possible.

I have managed to persuade the parliamentary authorities to allow me access to the internet via ADSL. This is a major step forward as I have been using a G3/GPRS card which is relatively slow.

My main routes of communication are now email and RSS. If people phone my offices I am emailed a message and if I get a letter that I need to personally see it is scanned in and emailed to me.

The essence of communication is continuing to change away from broadcasting towards narrowcasting. This is, of course, affecting politics as politics is about communication. Leaflets, however, remain important.

This raises the question of anonymity. I think there is a good case for people such as NHS Blog doc and the like to remain anonymous. The fact that their communication is disintermediated is important. The disintermediation of the large media organisations is as significant as in retail.

It is an interesting point, however, that Iain Dale is not anonymous, whereas RecessMonkey and Guido Fawkes are (although I do know them myself). Which works best is unclear and only time will tell.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Oddly, John, I'm still in Sparkbrook and Small Heath. When the boundaries change, after the next election, I look forward to being in the Labour-held seat of Yardley.

The anonymity thing is interesting. Recess Monkey and Guido are anonymous, but both have been outed. If anyone REALLY cared, they could work out who I am, but I doubt anyone could be bothered - I'm not that high profile and a few people do know who I am.

I choose anonymity just because it gives me a little more freedom to operate under the radar.

Thanks for reading, though. You are in good company - amongst others, my stats show regular hits from the City Council, Parliament, the Guardian and the BBC.

And rest assured, when Ming goes, this blog will again lead the charge with the battle cry of 'Hemming for Leader.'
Glyn Wintle said…
Two sites you might want to add to your Bloglines feed are the Open Rights Group and Spy Blog as they cover subjects that you have blogged about in the past.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…