Skip to main content

Domestic Wind Power

I have always wondered about the idea of installing a windmill on my roof. Without highlighting the companies I have been looking at the figures quoted by those companies that provide the windmills.

One says:
How much energy does it generate?
The xxx will generate around 10,000 kWh per year in a good wind site of 5.8m/s average. This is equivalent to five low-energy houses’ electricity demand, or the electrical needs of a twenty man office (i.e. lights, computers, servers, printers, faxes and phones)

Lets apply a bit of physics to this. kWh is a KiloWatt Hour. It is a measure of energy rather than power. If you have a single bar of an electric radiant heater (1 kW) on for an hour that provides the energy of a kWh.

If we even the figures out to calculate the average power we have to divide 10,000 by 365 days and then 24 hours. That gives you a power of 1.1 kW. Not actually as bad as it could be, but clearly not enough to power a 20 person office unless most of the equipment is kept off. (even if you multiply it up to 5kW by working hours.)

There is then the issue of having an average windspeed of 5.8m/s.

Wind Power has its role, but energy efficiency is the top priority.


Joe Otten said…
There is considerable skepticism towards micro turbines from such worthies as the Centre for Alternative Technology.

In some locations they will work, but the typical suburban rooftop gets too little wind and too much turbulence. A wind speed survey is recommended.

But with £1600 turbines appearing in B&Q next month, there is a risk of a big mis-selling problem.
Tom Gray said…
For readers, there is a lot of information on small wind turbines available from our Web site.

Thomas O. Gray
American Wind Energy Association
ecofx said…
Office hours do indeed end up as approx. 20% of the year, so you can multiply up by five, thus your calculation of 5kW for 20 people (250W per worker) during those hours is reasonable. This is 250W per office worker.

The biggest drains on power are computers plus peripherals and lighting, but 250W average is easily manageable, even without power management considerations.

The turbine you quote figures for (without naming it) is of a new vertical axis blade design, isn't it? To be able to get an average of 1.1kW out of a turbine, a conventional turbine would have a rated power of about 5kW, have a swept area of about 20 sqm, and be in a windy area on a decent mast to get above other air-flow obstructions.

The first production model of this new turbine seems to have a smaller swept area, but could perform more efficiently at (almost) roof height, so for windy locations these claims may also be reasonable.

According to the DTI, Moseley and Yardley get 5.3 and 5.2 m/s average wind speed at 10m off the ground, respectively.

However, although I am a supporter of wind power, consider your environment, John.
Go to the 'products in development page' to see a scale diagram of the turbine's size. I think even a 2.5 is a bit big for compact residential areas. But on a high mast (less noise at ground level), they would be fine at allotments, school playing fields etc.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…