Skip to main content

More war crimes in Lebanon

One of the difficulties of conflicts driven by major hatreds is that the participants do not themselves back from committing atrocities such as that in Qana.

It is often said that the pen is mightier than the sword. The long term impact of the war crimes in Lebanon will be to increase the amount of conflict in the world as a whole rather than reduce it.

Our own government has to accept some responsibility for their support of the military actions of Israel. They have not only supported the conflict through words, but also via deeds in allowing UK airspace to be used for the provision of munitions.

Whether Tony Blair's government will find themselves under investigation by the police for contravening Section 52 of the ICC Act 2001 remains to be seen. They do, however, run this risk.


Simon said…
And John, would you describe Hezbollah's indescriminate rocket attacks into Israel as war crimes also? And will you be pushing to have Hezbollah and its fighters punished in the ICC? Is it possible to imagine trying to round up these men? It is possible that in attempting to prosecute such men that it might "make the conflict worse", as seen from the perspective of radical Islamists who are committed to the destruction of Israel and have no regard or time for the norms of international law of Human Rights? Would they not see such a prosecution as "western imperialism" and the "interference of the west"? I think they might, you know. So are you really even handed here?

Just some thoughts.
john said…
Yes such attacks are war crimes as well. The basic issue is that we should not have such acts. If anyone in the UK had acted in a manner ancillary to such acts I would push for their prosecution.
Simon said…
Your position is consistent in this regard. However, the International Criminal Court is international in scope, of course. Why not push for Hezbollah to be prosecuted? For they have certainly violated international law and the norms of human rights, as you agree. Why only talk of Blair et al being prosecuted in this way?
john said…
The law is a UK law applicable to UK citizens. If it can be found that a UK citizen has contravened it then yes.
Manfarang said…
All of this is part of the 'war on terror'. A policy that is reducing the whole of the Middle East into a cauldron of hate and conflict.
What is needed is 'peace instead of terror'.The root causes of these conflicts must be addressed-ie a final resolution of the Israel/Palestine conflict.
john said…
True, but as a first step not making things worse would help.

Once people hate so much that they prefer revenge to peace a negotiated settlement becomes impossible.
Simon said…
Once people hate so much that they prefer revenge to peace a negotiated settlement becomes impossible.

Would you agree John that this is precisely what Hezbollah did when the attacked Israel without provocation? After all, Israel withdrew from Lebanon in 2000.
john said…
An unconditional ceasefire is a good first step.
Simon said…
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Simon said…
A temporary cessation of violence would not solve the basic problem - that Hizbollah have amassed a considerable military force with the express purpose of waging war on Israel. After all, what do they have all these Katyushka rockets for?

A temporary ceasefire would have to lead to the disarmament of Hizbollah to allow for the long term security of Lebanon's southern border with Israel.

Will Hizbollah disarm willingly? Not a chance. So who will disarm them? The Lebanese military itself has been unable to control she Southern region of the country, still less disarm a military force that is not just superior to themselves, but increasingly powerful to the extent of resisting the Israeli army - previously considered to be without peer in the region. Will a UN force be able to disarm Hizbollah? After the French experience in 1983, I severely doubt whether they will have much enthusiasm for this task. The Americans? The British? No chance. Some lesser army (the Pakistanis or the Australians or whoever)? No chance. So who then?

The alternative is to allow Hizbollah to retain military capacity, which will perpetuate that it is power and force in the region - committed as it is not just to the desctruction of Israel, but to the destruction of all Jews.

The question, John, is what comes after a ceasefire - and where will it lead? What comes next?
john said…
I understand that is the perspective of the Israeli government.

The challenge is not disarmament per se, but persuading people that they do not need to use arms.

In theory it is possible that a UN force could force out the rockets from southern Lebanon subsequent to a ceasefire which is the strict answer to your question. However, the real challenge is to get to a situation in which people do not wish to use arms.

From Israel's perspective the actions of their armed forces are removing a short term threat. They are, however, increasing a long term threat.

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…