Skip to main content

Lessons from Leicester Trial (New Year's Shootings)

The lessons from the trial in Leicester are that the rules of evidence do need variation to deal with very difficult situation. In situations in which witnesses need protection against violent people we need to protect their identities.

It is not possible for the police to continually give people new identities and there are so many shooting incidents that there has to be the facility for identities to be kept secret.

This clearly should apply in situations where there is clearly an element of conspiracy. However, it is these mechanisms that would enable progress against gangster crime whether it be linked to drugs, terrorism or indeed relate to matters such as the IRA's involvement in Robert McCartney's killing in Northern Ireland.

This killing was particularly brutal and is symptomatic of an environment in which the rule of law has been superseded by a heirarchical clan/tribal based structure.

The challenge, of course, is when politics gets infected by clan style loyalties. This has been identified as one of the key issues in Africa and relates to Political Anthropology. It also tends to lead toward corruption as decisionmaking gets based upon personal loyalties rather than systems of rules.

The danger of the postal vote system is that it encourages the development of political heirarchies dependent on intimidation and theft rather than acheiving popular support. To that extent it actually corrupts people as they are tempted to go in that direction.

This issue of the imperfection of human nature is something that the New Labour Party seem to be unaware of. Checks and balances devised over centuries to protect the rule of law have been undermined with little thought or true scrutiny.

The hazard of this is the development of forms of society in which people in positions of power are seen as untouchable and not subject to the rule of law. The people in Northern Ireland are not substantially different to people elsewhere. That is why the rules used for elections in Northern Ireland should be used elsewhere. There is no sense trying to increase turnout if we end up having a society where political power rests with gangster patrons and their clients - which is where all of this is going.

Still I have been spending time reviewing the transcripts of the Aston Election Court (which I will publish in full when I have the time). The opening statements for this occur on Tuesday. The Commissioner is expecting to produce a judgement within the fortnight after Easter (ie Early April).

It is worth someone going through the transcripts and picking out the highlights (there are about 800 pages of transcripts).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…