In Aubrey de Grey's 2015 Paper Do we have genes that exist to hasten aging? New data, new arguments, but the answer is still no he puts forward a number of arguments as to why he believes aging to be other than programmed aging (PA). One of these argument is his "COA Cancelling out argument". I extract from the paper his reasons for this. STRONGER CHALLENGES TO PA A simple but remarkably rarely stated argument against PA, which here I shall term the “cancelling-out argument” (COA), is that it is impossible for a species to maintain two sets of genetic pathways whose selected actions diametri cally oppose each other. Specifically, since we clearly have a large amount of genetic anti-aging machinery (repairing and pre-empting the damaging side-effects of metabolism), we cannot also have pro-aging machinery that accelerates the accumulation of such damage, unless the latter machinery is selected for another purpose. The logic leading to this con clusion is ...
John Hemming's Web Log