A debate has been ensuing on X/Twitter about Programmed aging in which unsurprisingly the question as to what is programmed aging came up. I thought I would ask chatGPT, Claude and Gemini for an answer. These are the answers: The prompt was: "what is the definition of programmed aging?" chatGPT: Programmed aging is the idea that aging is an evolved, genetically regulated process —more like a built-in “life-cycle program” that actively drives the gradual decline in function and increases the risk of death, rather than aging being only the passive accumulation of random damage. In this view: Aging happens because biological pathways are set up to shift the body into a late-life state (reduced repair/maintenance, altered immune/endocrine signaling, etc.), even if that late-life state is harmful to the individual . The “program” can be direct (genes/pathways exist to promote senescence/decline) or indirect/quasi-programmed (genes optimized for growth/...
In Aubrey de Grey's 2015 Paper Do we have genes that exist to hasten aging? New data, new arguments, but the answer is still no he puts forward a number of arguments as to why he believes aging to be other than programmed aging (PA). One of these argument is his "COA Cancelling out argument". I extract from the paper his reasons for this. STRONGER CHALLENGES TO PA A simple but remarkably rarely stated argument against PA, which here I shall term the “cancelling-out argument” (COA), is that it is impossible for a species to maintain two sets of genetic pathways whose selected actions diametri cally oppose each other. Specifically, since we clearly have a large amount of genetic anti-aging machinery (repairing and pre-empting the damaging side-effects of metabolism), we cannot also have pro-aging machinery that accelerates the accumulation of such damage, unless the latter machinery is selected for another purpose. The logic leading to this con clusion is ...