Skip to main content

Planning irregularities and Hong Kong

This is an interesting story about Hong Kong where the Chinese government committee selected leader is under threat as a result of building without planning permission.


Jake Maverick said…
here are, took me a couple of weeks to refind this one, in the meantime looks like it has been demolished after all....

point being in China they actually respect the rights of the individual over the psychotic minority with power/ immunity from prosecution....
similar local story in UK few weeks ago, heavily armed anon psycopaths broke in abducted the guy, no notice, stripped him naked/ gang rape left battered naked in c old concrete cell whilst filming him for at least a day from what i can they could wreck his house and steall all his personal belongings, was the official reason.....guy was in his seventies as well....all because it's considered more convenient than behaving like reasonable decent humans? or because they enjoy it? there is no sane or sound reason for attacking anybody, obviously (you mastwed a few million taxpayers' money establishing that simple fact)...but they get psychoanalysts to 'officially' certify a lot of the attacks these days....
still homeless as far as i know....

but with all the propaganda some gullible numpties could almost be forgiven for believing that china has a worse record on 'human rights'....they also sometimes hold govt officials to account/ execute them...they're also prepared to let you know WHO they's probably even legal to defend to yourself in china!

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).

Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men: