Skip to main content

Protest in Bratislava

protestbratislava This is a picture of the protest in Bratislava outside the British Embassy today. I have edited the photo to keep Surrey County Council happy as they have complained about my blog.
I have asked them what is wrong with my blog and they have not yet told me. It remains, however, that permission to appeal was granted today.
It is important to remember that the law must be the same for all citizens. Hence if Slovak citizens win appeals in the English courts then so should English people.
I was pleased that the family who went to court today are committed to fighting for everyone whatever race, religion or nationality. We met on the House of Commons Terrace.

Comments

J2R said…
I am behind all action and protests to stop the breakup of families forcing children through traumatic and uncaring experiences caused by the interference and evil within local authorities and the British Government. Many children are unnecessarily taken into care - they tried to put me into care because I had epilepsy but I was too bright for them to cope with, made threats and became too disruptive so they let me back home and I got back into mainstream school. If I hadn't got out of this I would have become unsafe.
Jake Maverick said…
non physical entities can't make complaints in the same way it's not non physical entities that go around murdering, torturing, abducting and raping people...

do you respond to anonymous threats John?
I don't--- i just lan on waiting until the threats become violent again and hope I have the strnegth to at least try and defend myself...continued attempts at communication only provokes more violence.

and how come you get complaints and the rest of us get anonymous threats/ attacks? do they have 'special people' for dealing with MPs/ non serfs?

did u get permission to publish that guy's photo WITH the censorship? he seems to be consenting for the photo...but i doubt he consneted to the misrepresentation/ censorship....

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…