Skip to main content

Hillsborough and Cover ups

Sadly the cover-up over Hillsborough is not unique. We have many signs of cover ups that have not yet been dealt with. I shall list some of them.

1. A US journalist has been banned from the UK because she wanted to investigate and report on Haut de la Garenne (see an EDM I tabled yesterday). Link now here
see comments.

2. Babies were made to breathe carbon monoxide at a concentration that is lethal (over time) for adults and the investigation called it an "inert gas".

 3. The general cover ups in the family courts where malpractise by psychologists is ignored and the HPC often refuses to investigate. This has resulted in a foreign country asking for help to deal with a case affecting one of their citizens. None of this is acceptable.

We need to get much better as a country at looking properly at issues and not just trusting the assurances of people in suits that everything is ok and we shouldn't worry.

some more on Leah goodman's case:

Her TV broadcast on Jersey now up on YouTube:
Her post yesterday on Jersey:
Change,org petition,


Mr. Hemming.

Could you please publish a link to your EDM regarding the banned U.S. Journalist Leah McGrath Goodman?

Could I also ask you and your readers to sign the petition submitted by Jersey politician, Deputy Trevor Pitman, in support of Ms. Goodman, "Democracy" and the freedom of the press?

The petition can be signed HERE
Thank you for writing this. I am sitting here watching Prime Minister's Questions with the same thoughts going through my mind. Absolutely nothing surprises me any more- the tampering of statements by the police, the complicity of the coroner or the manipulation of facts by the Press. I have seen and heard it all before. Jump forward how many years I wonder before we see true justice for families affected what I have always thought of as the worst travesty of justice in my life time.
Here is a posting we did back in July on the Leah McGrath Goodman STORY
Jake Maverick said…
Damnsite more being 'covered up' or just ignored than that, isn't there John...?
not enough space on this webpage for the list....

and 'guys in suits'...despite the blatantly sexist remark ;-) i thought it was more psycopaths in masks, sometimes wearing body armour, heavily armed and no identifying marks 'cept for random letters and numbers soemtimes on their WWI era type helmets?

it won't stop until people are actually identified and prosecuted for their crimes...including everybody who 'followed' the orders and the journalists that reported anonymous hearsay as 'fact'---saying sorry decades after the fact doesn't cover it...whether it was 90 odd murders or manslaughter is for a jury to decide, surely?
it's not a difficult concept, prosecute criminals for what criminals do, which means every pigyob in the country, Boris Johnson and every fracker anyway involved with 60 minute makeover for a sstart....
Jake Maverick said…
probably best to blow my ration on the last one, but i bet you publish this one instead?
Jake Maverick said…
he changed 'guys' to 'people' making my comment look out of place and non sensical.....of course if he did that in court papers he would no doubt get a promotion and another innocent end up in jail.........well, pay rise at least----you have to murder at least one person to be guaranteed of a promotion!

Popular posts from this blog

Statement re false allegations from Esther Baker

Statement by John Hemming
I am pleased that the Police have now made it clear that there has been a concerted effort to promote false criminal allegations against me and that the allegations had no substance whatsoever.
I would like to thank Emily Cox, my children, Ayaz Iqbal (my Solicitor), my local lib dem team and many others who supported me through this dreadful experience. There are many worse things that happen to people, but this was a really bad experience.
It is bad enough to have false allegations made about yourself to the police, but to have a concerted campaign involving your political opponents and many others in public creates an environment in which it is reasonable to be concerned about ill founded vigilante attacks on your family and yourself. Luckily there was a more substantial lobby to the contrary as well, which included many people who were themselves real survivors of abuse, which has helped.
I am normally someone who helps other people fight injustice. …

Homelessness vs Selling Books

Candidates in elections tend to find themselves very busy with lots of things to do.  It is, therefore, necessary to prioritise things to ensure that the important things are dealt with.

To me the issue of homelessness and rough sleeping is an important issue.  Therefore, when Birmingham's Faith Leaders group contacted me to ask me what I would propose and whether I would work with them to make things better I was pleased to respond with my views and indicate that I would work with them after the election.

The Faith Leaders Group (Bishops and other religious leaders in Birmingham) have now sent out their report.

Sadly, according to their report,  I was the only candidate for Yardley to respond.  The group in their report said:

"Particularly disappointing was the lack of response from some of those candidates seeking re-election as MP for their respective constituencies."
It is worth looking at the priorities of my opponent.
Interestingly today she has decided to be at th…

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.

I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…