Skip to main content

Statutory Orphans and SSDA903

This judgment (today) shows how depressing the system is in terms of how it looks after children. Children have been made statutory orphans and then just left in that state. In fact the government could if it could be bothered track how many children are in that state through the SSDA903 return, but hasn't been bothered to do so. It is a mistake to think there is anything substantially different in a placement order from a freeing order. Both separate children from their family networks (and often their siblings) without actually ensuring there is an alternative. Anyone who looks objectively at the system has to conclude that it is depressingly bad.

Comments

Jerry said…
http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2012/1689.html
Depressingly bad? Horrifically awful may still be an understatement. The only explanations I have found:

1. my late husband used to say "whatever the government sets up, it achieves the opposite"

2. you saying "Social Services get involved when they shouldn't and don't get involved when they should"

3. too many people benefitting: ** from being supplied kids for their paedophile activities

** from being paid as foster carers, in foster homes, adoption agencies, legal teams, expert witnesses - a major industry, fuelled by the 'financial economy'

The UK is no 1, not only in terms of indebtedness, but also financial economy vs real economy. See http://bit.ly/MPZ1IC

"Strange" priorities...
Laura Halligan said…
oh gosh.. unbelievably!! I watched that program you did a few years ago and published it on my page at http://justiceforukfamilies.ning.com/profile/LauraHalligan

oh golly its so bad.. especially when you are going through it.. hey hun I am willing to do anything to work with the system and anyone you want me to.. I know you might think this is silly, but I feel I have a lot to offer and have had first hand experiance from all anlgles.

They just choose to inflict hell.. Its the powers of the negative.. the powers of evil working through the system..

but it will only leed to more evil for the country... I believe I am on a mission to help save this planet.. start with this system and law first... please include me in anything you want if it can anyway help the system...

once people understand the rules on how energy works and we create our worlds by what energies we create.. then we can make the right choices and take the right guidence from God.. when you have found God you will never look anywhere else for advice again!!

with lots of love always
from laura halligan

Popular posts from this blog

Millionaires and politics

The Labour Party spent most of the last election criticising me for being a successful businessman (aka millionaire). That is business in the private sector employing over 250 people. It is worth looking at the situation for the Labour Candidate now:

For the year 2016-7 Annual Income from Parliament74,962Specifically for her book51,250Other media income etc5,322.82Total declared income131,534.82

Traditionally anyone with an annual income of over £100,000 has been considered to be a millionaire. I did not use my position in parliament to increase my income.


I have been asked for sources for this. This BBC piece looks at how one should define rich. It was written in 2011 so the figures will be slightly out of date. There are perhaps 2 relevant pieces:
"In 1880 a rich person would have had £100,000 in assets or an income of £10,000 a year, he says. About a hundred people a year died leaving £100,000 and by 1910 this was 250 - "a microscopic fraction of the number of death…

Gender Issues comparison of candidates

John Hemming believes that an MP should represent everyone in their constituency.  This should be regardless of their race, religion, gender, abledness, sexual orientation or anything else.  It should be everyone.

When he was an MP he worked on issues relating to men, those relating to women and those relating to non-binary people. Everyone.

For example here is John Hemming on a demonstration outside the courts with the campaign group Women Against Rape (it related to the case of a mother who had her child removed from her because the mother was raped).




Jess Phillips, who campaigns on women's issues, notwithstanding the questions asked about her appointments in her parliamentary office, had the following response when asked for a debate on issues specifically relating to men:

The Labour Candidate's Book Promotion Tour and Why It Matters

In the 2015 General Election the Labour Candidate criticised John Hemming for having an external interest and made a pledge that she would be a "Full Time MP for Yardley and my only other job will be mom & carer ...".  Here is a copy of that pledge:


Since that point she has been working on paid Television Programmes and has also written a book. John Hemming has made no secret of the fact that he chairs the board of the company he founded in 1983. This involves one meeting a month. When he was the MP for Yardley he was a full time MP and the Job of being MP for Yardley came first. The Labour candidate has reported 1,274 hours of work other than being an MP in the two years she has been elected and her income in the last year was over £131,000.

Ignoring the question as to how she reconciles that with her "pledge" the question is raised as to what extent her external activity conflicts with the role of Member of Parliament for Yardley. She is supposed to de…